evidoria

What works in Bangkok

All catalogues · Thailand profile

13
evaluated practices
62/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 13 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Bangkok

Bangkok's infrastructure problem-reporting system, Traffy Fondue, dramatically cut resolution times from roughly two months to about two days for issues like potholes and flooding, achieving 91% citizen satisfaction and an estimated US$2.14 million in annual savings across 98,000 analysed reports. A Bangkok case study within the nationwide 'AI for Teachers' programme documented a 30% boost in student engagement when educators used AI-assisted planning tools, though this represents a single documented instance rather than city-wide data. The evidence demonstrates Bangkok's success in civic tech adoption and early classroom AI integration, but does not quantify broader patterns of digital service delivery or educational outcomes across the city.

Drawn from: Net Pracharat – Village Broadband Internet Project · Traffy Fondue: LINE-Based Citizen Issue Reporting for Bangkok · Thailand 'AI for Teachers' — Upskilling 160,000 Educators Nationwide · Baan Mankong — Thailand's Community-Driven Secure Housing Programme · Traffy Fondue — Thailand's AI citizen complaint management system · Thailand Gender-Responsive Budgeting — From Constitutional Commitment to Whole-of-Government Implementation · Thailand's Long-Term Resident (LTR) Visa — Work-from-Thailand Professional Track · UN Women AI School — Regional AI Upskilling for Gender-Equality Advocates Across Asia-Pacific

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Equity & inclusion +35 pts 89 here · 54 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +32 pts 83 here · 51 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Evidence of learning impact +14 pts 44 here · 30 average

Sustainability +14 pts 93 here · 80 average

Scalability & sustainability +12 pts 78 here · 66 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Innovation level +9 pts 73 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -9 pts 44 here · 54 average

Governance, certification & transferability -19 pts 47 here · 66 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Curator validation -75 pts 0 here · 75 average

Effectiveness -81 pts 0 here · 81 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Equity & inclusion
89 · 54
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
83 · 51
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Evidence of learning impact
44 · 30
Sustainability
93 · 80
Scalability & sustainability
78 · 66
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Innovation level
73 · 64
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 60
Inclusiveness / equity
44 · 41
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
78 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 35
Transferability / replicability
57 · 59
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 53
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 40
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Transparency, fairness & accountability
44 · 54
Governance, certification & transferability
47 · 66
Efficiency
0 · 52
Curator validation
0 · 75
Effectiveness
0 · 81

Coloured bar: Bangkok. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Net Pracharat – Village Broadband Internet Project · 92

Traffy Fondue: LINE-Based Citizen Issue Reporting for Bangkok · 81

Thailand 'AI for Teachers' — Upskilling 160,000 Educators Nationwide · 80

Baan Mankong — Thailand's Community-Driven Secure Housing Programme · 76

Traffy Fondue — Thailand's AI citizen complaint management system · 73

Thailand Gender-Responsive Budgeting — From Constitutional Commitment to Whole-of-Government Implementation · 63

Thailand's Long-Term Resident (LTR) Visa — Work-from-Thailand Professional Track · 62

UN Women AI School — Regional AI Upskilling for Gender-Equality Advocates Across Asia-Pacific · 60

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more