What works in Edinburgh
All catalogues · United Kingdom profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +56 pts 83 here · 28 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +35 pts 83 here · 48 average
Governance, certification & transferability +31 pts 94 here · 64 average
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +27 pts 33 here · 6 average
Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average
Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average
Weaknesses
Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average
Evaluation evidence -15 pts 33 here · 49 average
Achievement / evidence -21 pts 67 here · 88 average
Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average
Effectiveness -34 pts 33 here · 68 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Edinburgh. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018 — Criminalising Coercive Control as a Course of Behaviour · 96
UK Peatland Code · 93
Scaling Scotland's Nationwide Participatory Budgeting with NLP on the Consul Platform · 87
Peatland ACTION (Scotland) · 73
Woodland Carbon Code (UK) · 73
Connecting Scotland — Devices, Data and Digital Champions for Digitally Excluded Households · 72
Scotland Period Products (Free Provision) Act 2021 · 63
Scotland's Nature Restoration Fund — National Grant Scheme for Habitat Recovery · 53
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more