evidoria

What works in Edinburgh

All catalogues · United Kingdom profile

9
evaluated practices
71/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 9 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +65 pts 100 here · 35 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +36 pts 44 here · 9 average

Governance, certification & transferability +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +27 pts 78 here · 51 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +25 pts 78 here · 53 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Transferability / replicability +18 pts 78 here · 59 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Scalability & sustainability +17 pts 83 here · 66 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Documented learning -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Curator validation -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Evidence of learning impact -30 pts 0 here · 30 average

Effectiveness -31 pts 50 here · 81 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
100 · 35
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
44 · 9
Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 66
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
78 · 51
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
78 · 53
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 80
Transferability / replicability
78 · 59
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Scalability & sustainability
83 · 66
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 60
Efficiency
50 · 52
Innovation level
60 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 39
Documented learning
50 · 73
Demonstrated reach
50 · 75
Curator validation
50 · 75
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 30
Effectiveness
50 · 81
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36

Coloured bar: Edinburgh. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018 — Criminalising Coercive Control as a Course of Behaviour · 96

UK Peatland Code · 93

Scaling Scotland's Nationwide Participatory Budgeting with NLP on the Consul Platform · 87

Peatland ACTION (Scotland) · 73

Woodland Carbon Code (UK) · 73

Scotland Period Products (Free Provision) Act 2021 · 63

eSKILLS4ALL · 52

Get Digital · 52

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Girl Power - Denmark · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Soroptimist · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more