What works in Kingstown
All catalogues · Saint Vincent and the Grenadines profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Kingstown
The Gender Aware Beneficiary Assessment of St. Vincent and the Grenadines' Public Assistance Programme found that Kingstown, the capital, is the centralised location where the Public Assistance Programme's application process is run, creating a disproportionate burden on women with childcare or mobility constraints who must travel there to apply. The assessment identified this geographic centralisation as a structural barrier to equitable access to the country's main social-assistance safety net. No quantified data on the scale of this burden or outcome improvements from decentralisation efforts are documented in the available evidence.
Drawn from: Blue Economy Technology Extension — Compete Caribbean's SME Support Programme in St. Vincent and the Grenadines · Gender Aware Beneficiary Assessment of St. Vincent and the Grenadines' Public Assistance Programme · One Laptop per Student Initiative
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Transferability / replicability +40 pts 100 here · 60 average
Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +25 pts 100 here · 75 average
Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 42 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average
Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Evidence of impact / measured results +8 pts 67 here · 59 average
Weaknesses
Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average
Innovation level -26 pts 37 here · 63 average
Efficiency -43 pts 0 here · 43 average
Evaluation evidence -45 pts 0 here · 45 average
Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average
Effectiveness -76 pts 0 here · 76 average
Impact on gender equality -79 pts 0 here · 79 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Kingstown. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Gender Aware Beneficiary Assessment of St. Vincent and the Grenadines' Public Assistance Programme · 56
One Laptop per Student Initiative · 48
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Step-by-Step — Refugee-Redesigned Digital Mental Health App, Trialled Nationally in Lebanon · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more