evidoria

What works in Los Angeles

All catalogues · United States of America profile

3
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
67%
strong evidence, of 3 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Los Angeles

Drawn from: Benefit Navigator — Imagine LA and Nava's AI Chatbot Improves Caseworker Accuracy by 40% in a Los Angeles County Pilot · LA County's Homelessness Prevention Unit — A UCLA California Policy Lab Model Ranks 90,000 People to Target $26 Million in Aid · Los Angeles Unified's 'Ed' chatbot (AllHere collapse)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Transparency, fairness & accountability +46 pts 100 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +41 pts 100 here · 59 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +19 pts 83 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / demonstrated replication -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Scalability & sustainability -19 pts 44 here · 64 average

Evidence of learning impact -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Score profile vs peers

Transparency, fairness & accountability
100 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
100 · 59
Governance, capability & sustainability
83 · 64
Transferability / demonstrated replication
50 · 60
Scalability & sustainability
44 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 28
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 37
Transparency, ethics & data protection
0 · 48
Equity & inclusion
0 · 52

Coloured bar: Los Angeles. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Benefit Navigator — Imagine LA and Nava's AI Chatbot Improves Caseworker Accuracy by 40% in a Los Angeles County Pilot · 80

LA County's Homelessness Prevention Unit — A UCLA California Policy Lab Model Ranks 90,000 People to Target $26 Million in Aid · 73

Los Angeles Unified's 'Ed' chatbot (AllHere collapse) · 7

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more