evidoria

What works in Olympia

All catalogues · United States of America profile

3
evaluated practices
31/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 2 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Innovation level -22 pts 40 here · 62 average

Transferability / replicability -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average

Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average

Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes -79 pts 0 here · 79 average

Achievement / evidence -88 pts 0 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -89 pts 0 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Curator validation
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Scalability & sustainability
67 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Innovation level
40 · 62
Transferability / replicability
33 · 60
Sustainability (ongoing)
50 · 78
Efficiency
0 · 33
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 37
Evaluation evidence
0 · 49
Effectiveness
0 · 68
Impact on gender equality
0 · 71
Documented learning
0 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 79
Achievement / evidence
0 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 89

Coloured bar: Olympia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

OtterBot — Washington State's AI-Assisted FAFSA and Financial-Aid Navigation Chatbot for Low-Income Seniors · 40

Digital Navigator Program — Washington State Department of Veterans Affairs · 28

Washington's pay-range job-posting mandate (EPOA, 2023) — transparency by statute, enforced through hundreds of applicant class actions · 26

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more