evidoria

What works in Bahamas

All catalogues

10
evaluated practices
37/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 9 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Bahamas

The Bahamas has deployed several digital initiatives with mixed evidence of impact. AccessAbility Bahamas Mobile App reached over 2,000 users (roughly 20% of persons with disabilities) in its first year, though this relies on government self-reporting rather than independent evaluation. Nassau's Real-Time Crime Center operates 750+ AI-enabled cameras with facial recognition and gunshot detection, though vendor-cited traffic-safety gains (69 to 33 fatal incidents) predate the current system's 2020-2021 upgrade. The DARE Act established a digital-assets regulatory framework that responded swiftly to FTX's 2022 collapse, resulting in a $221.55 million penalty claim recognized in 2025, while King's College School reported a 9.2-percentage-point academic performance gain from an AI adaptive-learning pilot, though without independent validation.

Drawn from: AccessAbility Bahamas Mobile App · The DARE Act — Bahamas' Digital-Assets Regulatory Framework, and the FTX Collapse · Nassau's Real-Time Crime Center — The Bahamas' AI-Enabled Facial-Recognition and Gunshot-Detection Policing Network · Inspired AI Adaptive Learning Pilot — King's College School, Nassau · The Bahamas Debt Conversion for Marine Conservation (Nature Bond) · RM2.ai — the Bahamas' Public Hospitals Authority Pilots AI-Powered Remote Monitoring for Seniors · Bahamas Debt Conversion Project for Marine Conservation · The Bahamas' 2016 Constitutional Referendum on Gender-Equal Citizenship Rights - A Failed Reform

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evidence of learning impact +22 pts 50 here · 28 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Weaknesses

Innovation -10 pts 53 here · 63 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -14 pts 17 here · 31 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -17 pts 42 here · 59 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average

Scalability -19 pts 44 here · 64 average

Transferability / replicability -20 pts 40 here · 60 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -21 pts 17 here · 37 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -31 pts 17 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion -36 pts 17 here · 52 average

Sustainability -37 pts 42 here · 78 average

Inclusiveness / equity -42 pts 0 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -42 pts 33 here · 76 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Achievement / evidence -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evidence of learning impact
50 · 28
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Innovation
53 · 63
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 31
Evidence of impact / measured results
42 · 59
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 51
Scalability
44 · 64
Transferability / replicability
40 · 60
Teacher capability & pedagogy
17 · 37
Transparency, ethics & data protection
17 · 48
Equity & inclusion
17 · 52
Sustainability
42 · 78
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
33 · 76
Efficiency
0 · 44
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 50
Documented learning
0 · 74
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80
Achievement / evidence
0 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 91

Coloured bar: Bahamas. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

AccessAbility Bahamas Mobile App · 72

The DARE Act — Bahamas' Digital-Assets Regulatory Framework, and the FTX Collapse · 52

Nassau's Real-Time Crime Center — The Bahamas' AI-Enabled Facial-Recognition and Gunshot-Detection Policing Network · 47

Inspired AI Adaptive Learning Pilot — King's College School, Nassau · 33

The Bahamas Debt Conversion for Marine Conservation (Nature Bond) · 33

UB–KAUST–Partanna AI Micro-Course Sends Five Bahamian Students on Fully-Funded Saudi AI Scholarships · 27

RM2.ai — the Bahamas' Public Hospitals Authority Pilots AI-Powered Remote Monitoring for Seniors · 27

Bahamas Debt Conversion Project for Marine Conservation · 27

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Bahamas concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more