evidoria

What works in Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)

All catalogues

12
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 10 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)

Drawn from: Instant Network Schools — Refugee & Host-Community Digital Learning (DRC) · Panzi Hospital's One-Stop Centre Model for Survivors of Sexual Violence · Instant Network Schools — Vodafone Foundation and UNHCR's Offline Adaptive Classrooms Reach Refugees in Équateur, DR Congo · AI-Powered Malaria Test Readers Strengthen DR Congo's National Malaria Control Programme · DRC Mai-Ndombe Emission Reductions Programme (FCPF / World Bank) · Orange Digital Center DR Congo · STEPS — AI-Assisted Science Textbooks Scale to 101 Emmanuel Community Schools in DR Congo · Congo Basin Peatlands Governance Project — Cuvette Centrale (DRC & Republic of Congo)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +41 pts 100 here · 59 average

Scalability beyond pilot +28 pts 92 here · 64 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +19 pts 50 here · 31 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -27 pts 50 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -30 pts 50 here · 80 average

Achievement / evidence -41 pts 50 here · 91 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Evidence of impact / measured public value
100 · 59
Scalability beyond pilot
92 · 64
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
50 · 31
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 37
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 50
Innovation level
60 · 63
Transparency, ethics & data protection
44 · 48
Sustainability (ongoing)
75 · 78
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 50
Documented learning
50 · 74
Effectiveness
50 · 77
Impact on gender equality
50 · 80
Achievement / evidence
50 · 91
Efficiency
0 · 44

Coloured bar: Congo (the Democratic Republic of the). Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Instant Network Schools — Refugee & Host-Community Digital Learning (DRC) · 96

Panzi Hospital's One-Stop Centre Model for Survivors of Sexual Violence · 89

Instant Network Schools — Vodafone Foundation and UNHCR's Offline Adaptive Classrooms Reach Refugees in Équateur, DR Congo · 73

AI-Powered Malaria Test Readers Strengthen DR Congo's National Malaria Control Programme · 73

DRC Mai-Ndombe Emission Reductions Programme (FCPF / World Bank) · 73

Orange Digital Center DR Congo · 68

STEPS — AI-Assisted Science Textbooks Scale to 101 Emmanuel Community Schools in DR Congo · 67

Congo Basin Peatlands Governance Project — Cuvette Centrale (DRC & Republic of Congo) · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Congo (the Democratic Republic of the) concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more