What works in Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)
All catalogues
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)
The evidence shows four distinct humanitarian and development interventions operating in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. CDR-Triggered Mobile Money dramatically reduced emergency cash delivery time from ~100 days to under 10 days in eastern DRC, reaching 5,600+ displaced people across 8 armed-attack events over five months. Instant Network Schools operates 28 centres across the DRC (part of a 164-centre, 6-country programme), delivering digital learning to refugees and host-community students with measured increases of 61% in student ICT literacy and 125% in teacher ICT literacy programme-wide. Panzi Hospital's One-Stop Centre Model in Bukavu treated 48,482 women for extreme sexual violence between 1999 and 2015, integrating medical, psychosocial, legal and socio-economic support at a single site. The evidence demonstrates responses to displacement crises, educational access gaps, and sexual violence, though most quantified outcomes are either programme-wide across multiple countries or time-limited to specific evaluation periods.
Drawn from: CDR-Triggered Mobile Money — Cutting Emergency Cash Delivery from 100 Days to Under 10 in Eastern DRC · Instant Network Schools — Refugee & Host-Community Digital Learning (DRC) · Panzi Hospital's One-Stop Centre Model for Survivors of Sexual Violence · Instant Network Schools — Vodafone Foundation and UNHCR's Offline Adaptive Classrooms Reach Refugees in Équateur, DR Congo · AI-Powered Malaria Test Readers Strengthen DR Congo's National Malaria Control Programme · DRC Mai-Ndombe Emission Reductions Programme (FCPF / World Bank) · Orange Digital Center DR Congo · Using Drones and Machine Learning to Build Kananga's First Modern Property Tax Roll, D.R. Congo
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average
Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +26 pts 53 here · 27 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average
Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average
Weaknesses
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -8 pts 40 here · 48 average
Governance, certification & transferability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -14 pts 33 here · 48 average
Effectiveness -16 pts 50 here · 66 average
Impact on gender equality -20 pts 50 here · 70 average
Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average
Achievement / evidence -37 pts 50 here · 87 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Congo (the Democratic Republic of the). Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Instant Network Schools — Refugee & Host-Community Digital Learning (DRC) · 96
Panzi Hospital's One-Stop Centre Model for Survivors of Sexual Violence · 89
AI-Powered Malaria Test Readers Strengthen DR Congo's National Malaria Control Programme · 73
DRC Mai-Ndombe Emission Reductions Programme (FCPF / World Bank) · 73
Orange Digital Center DR Congo · 68
Using Drones and Machine Learning to Build Kananga's First Modern Property Tax Roll, D.R. Congo · 67
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Cities with evaluated practice
Where the documented practice in Congo (the Democratic Republic of the) concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more