evidoria

What works in Micronesia

All catalogues

4
evaluated practices
66/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Micronesia

Drawn from: Digital FSM: East Micronesia Cable & National Connectivity Project · FSM's Nationwide Secured Transactions Registry — Two Decades of Movable-Asset Lending · Breaking FSM's All-Male Congress: Gender Machinery and the 2021 Konman Election · Micronesia Conservation Trust — Regional Endowment for Protected-Area Ecosystem Services

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Governance, certification & transferability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +10 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Innovation level -15 pts 47 here · 62 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average

Evaluated outcomes -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 48
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 64
Curator validation
100 · 73
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 74
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 78
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 57
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 27
Scalability
67 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Innovation level
47 · 62
Efficiency
0 · 32
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 48
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Impact on gender equality
0 · 70
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 78

Coloured bar: Micronesia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Digital FSM: East Micronesia Cable & National Connectivity Project · 92

FSM's Nationwide Secured Transactions Registry — Two Decades of Movable-Asset Lending · 76

Breaking FSM's All-Male Congress: Gender Machinery and the 2021 Konman Election · 48

Micronesia Conservation Trust — Regional Endowment for Protected-Area Ecosystem Services · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Micronesia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more