evidoria

What works in French Guiana

All catalogues

2
evaluated practices
46/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 2 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average

Sustainability / continuity -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Transferability / demonstrated replication -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Scalability -29 pts 33 here · 62 average

Governance, certification & transferability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average

Score profile vs peers

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 48
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 74
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 28
Innovation
67 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Sustainability / continuity
67 · 78
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured results
33 · 57
Transferability / demonstrated replication
33 · 60
Scalability
33 · 62
Governance, certification & transferability
33 · 64

Coloured bar: French Guiana. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Guyane Développement Innovation — Building a Post-Spaceport Bioeconomy in French Guiana · 52

Parc amazonien de Guyane — Indigenous Co-Governed Amazon Rainforest Park · 40

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more