evidoria

What works in Greece

All catalogues

45
evaluated practices
54/100
average quality score
5%
strong evidence, of 40 assessed
6
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Greece

Greece has implemented multiple initiatives to increase women's representation in politics and entrepreneurship. Decision 65/2019 on gender quota for the candidates at all electoral procedures established a binding 40% gender quota for candidates across all electoral levels (national, regional, municipal and European), raising it from the previous one-third requirement, though the practice notes this "significantly increased women's representation" without citing independent data on the scale of impact. Additionally, Brave Women in Action supported 50 women through an entrepreneurship programme in 2021, resulting in 5 businesses started, while Women in political decision-making positions - Greece works to boost women's representation through engagement with political parties and women's organisations at European, national and local levels.

Drawn from: Women in political decision-making positions- Greece · Decision 65/2019 on gender quota for the candidates at all electoral procedures · synAthina — civic-activity platform of the City of Athens · Greece's Three-Cycle Digital Accessibility Monitoring (2021–2024) — a Persistent 90% Accessibility-Statement Gap · Brave Women in Action · More Women in European politics – More Women in 2014 · AI-Assisted Legal Review at the Hellenic Cadastre — Cutting a National Backlog by Up to 90% · Junior Coding Academy

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Inclusiveness / equity +11 pts 53 here · 42 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +10 pts 17 here · 7 average

Curator validation +9 pts 84 here · 74 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Transferability / replicability +8 pts 68 here · 59 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +8 pts 58 here · 50 average

Weaknesses

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -9 pts 42 here · 51 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -10 pts 81 here · 91 average

Sustainability -10 pts 68 here · 78 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -14 pts 17 here · 31 average

Demonstrated reach -19 pts 57 here · 76 average

Evaluation evidence -30 pts 14 here · 45 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Documented learning
100 · 74
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
53 · 42
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
17 · 7
Curator validation
84 · 74
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Transferability / replicability
68 · 59
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
58 · 50
Governance, capability & sustainability
70 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Innovation level
68 · 63
Evidence of impact / measured results
64 · 59
Equity & inclusion
56 · 52
Evaluated outcomes
88 · 84
Scalability
67 · 64
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
73 · 76
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
42 · 51
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
81 · 91
Sustainability
68 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 31
Demonstrated reach
57 · 76
Evaluation evidence
14 · 45

Coloured bar: Greece. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Women in political decision-making positions- Greece · 96

Decision 65/2019 on gender quota for the candidates at all electoral procedures · 89

synAthina — civic-activity platform of the City of Athens · 86

Greece's Three-Cycle Digital Accessibility Monitoring (2021–2024) — a Persistent 90% Accessibility-Statement Gap · 84

Brave Women in Action · 82

More Women in European politics – More Women in 2014 · 81

AI-Assisted Legal Review at the Hellenic Cadastre — Cutting a National Backlog by Up to 90% · 80

Junior Coding Academy · 76

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Greece concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more