evidoria

What works in Greece

All catalogues

52
evaluated practices
54/100
average quality score
4%
strong evidence, of 49 assessed
6
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Greece

Greece has implemented multiple initiatives to advance women's political representation and economic empowerment: Decision 65/2019 established a 40% gender quota for candidates across all electoral procedures, raising the prior one-third quota, while a European Commission–funded project works to increase women's representation in decision-making at European, national and local levels. On entrepreneurship, Brave Women in Action ran a three-month intensive programme with 50 women in 2021, resulting in 5 businesses started. Separately, synAthina, Athens's civic-activity platform, has documented 1,918 civil-society activities from 222 registered community groups and influenced 5 regulatory or policy updates. However, the practices shown do not provide independent quantitative evidence on the actual impact of these gender quota or representation-building measures.

Drawn from: Women in political decision-making positions- Greece · Decision 65/2019 on gender quota for the candidates at all electoral procedures · synAthina — civic-activity platform of the City of Athens · Greece's Three-Cycle Digital Accessibility Monitoring (2021–2024) — a Persistent 90% Accessibility-Statement Gap · Brave Women in Action · More Women in European politics – More Women in 2014 · AI-Assisted Legal Review at the Hellenic Cadastre — Cutting a National Backlog by Up to 90% · Junior Coding Academy

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +12 pts 50 here · 38 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +11 pts 17 here · 6 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +10 pts 58 here · 48 average

Curator validation +8 pts 81 here · 73 average

Weaknesses

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -10 pts 17 here · 27 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 61 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes -14 pts 64 here · 78 average

Demonstrated reach -18 pts 57 here · 76 average

Evaluation evidence -35 pts 14 here · 49 average

Score profile vs peers

Documented learning
100 · 74
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 38
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
17 · 6
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
58 · 48
Curator validation
81 · 73
Inclusiveness / equity
50 · 43
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Governance, capability & sustainability
70 · 64
Equity & inclusion
56 · 50
Scalability
67 · 62
Evidence of impact / measured results
61 · 57
Innovation level
65 · 62
Effectiveness
67 · 66
Impact on gender equality
67 · 70
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 26
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
84 · 89
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
42 · 48
Efficiency
25 · 32
Sustainability
70 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 27
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
61 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
64 · 78
Demonstrated reach
57 · 76
Evaluation evidence
14 · 49

Coloured bar: Greece. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Women in political decision-making positions- Greece · 96

Decision 65/2019 on gender quota for the candidates at all electoral procedures · 89

synAthina — civic-activity platform of the City of Athens · 86

Greece's Three-Cycle Digital Accessibility Monitoring (2021–2024) — a Persistent 90% Accessibility-Statement Gap · 84

Brave Women in Action · 82

More Women in European politics – More Women in 2014 · 81

AI-Assisted Legal Review at the Hellenic Cadastre — Cutting a National Backlog by Up to 90% · 80

Junior Coding Academy · 76

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Greece concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more