evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Altépetl Bienestar — Mexico City's Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Suelo de Conservación

Mexico · Mexico City · See the Mexico profile · See the Mexico City profile

Top 81% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Mexico City pays communities in its 87,000+ hectare Suelo de Conservación to protect forests and aquifer recharge. Since 2019, Altépetl Bienestar has reached 36,594 beneficiaries, but academic review found predecessor schemes' environmental outcomes weakly measured.

Details

Promoter
Secretaría del Medio Ambiente de la Ciudad de México (SEDEMA)
Period
2008–present
Keywords
payments for ecosystem services, urban conservation land, watershed protection, community forestry

Description

Mexico City's Suelo de Conservación covers more than 87,000 hectares of forest, farmland and wetland surrounding the built-up city. It supplies much of the aquifer recharge and biodiversity for the Valley of Mexico, and since 2008 the city's environment ministry, SEDEMA, has run payment-for-ecosystem-services schemes for the rural and indigenous communities (ejidos and comunidades) who own this land.

Two flagship programmes, PROFACE (2008–2018, roughly 105.9 million pesos per year, about 5,000 annual beneficiaries) and PRCSA (2010–2018, roughly 20 million pesos per year, 6 community agrarian nuclei covering 13,500+ hectares of ecological reserves), paid residents for surveillance, restoration and conservation work. Since 2019 they have been succeeded by Altépetl Bienestar, which reports 36,594 direct beneficiaries over its first three years; a related 2022 payment allocated more than 5 million pesos to five agrarian communities across 4,931 hectares.

A peer-reviewed policy-coherence study in the journal Región y Sociedad found the environmental dimension of PROFACE and PRCSA produced "limited and unclear effects" on land-use change, that beneficiaries became economically dependent on the subsidies without developing sustainable alternatives, and that payments sometimes intensified rather than resolved internal conflicts within agrarian communities. The programmes show both the scale a city-funded PES scheme can reach and how hard it is to prove its ecological impact.

Read the full analysis: https://sedema.cdmx.gob.mx/comunicacion/nota/beneficia-sedema-13-mil-habitantes-del-suelo-de-conservacion-en-la-ciudad-de-mexico-para-2022

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful