evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Amara y Ullujalla — Peru's First Conservation Concession for a Fog-Oasis (Lomas) Ecosystem

Peru · Ocucaje · See the Peru profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 40% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

In April 2024 Peru granted its first Concession for Conservation over a lomas fog-oasis: 6,449 hectares in Ica region, protected 30+ years after 15+ years of advocacy by a local NGO, Kew and a community farm. Only 4% of Peru and Chile's lomas are protected.

6,449 hectares
Concession area (granted April 2024)
95 species (of ~675 known lomas species)
Lomas plant species recorded on site (site surveys)
~40 %
Endemic species share (site surveys)
~30 %
Threatened species share (site surveys)
~4 %
Lomas ecosystem currently protected (Peru & Chile) (n/a)

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Huarango Nature, with SERFOR (Peru's National Forest and Wildlife Service), Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and Samaca farm
Period
Concession granted 12 April 2024; minimum 30-year term
Keywords
biodiversity conservation, protected-area concession, fog-oasis ecosystem, ecotourism

Context

In April 2024, Peru's national forestry authority (SERFOR) granted a renewable 30-year Concession for Conservation over 6,449 hectares (15,936 acres) of lomas — fog-fed desert oasis — in the Ocucaje and Santiago districts of the Ica region. The concession, named Lomas y Tillandsiales de Amara y Ullujalla, is managed by the local NGO Huarango Nature in partnership with the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and the neighbouring Samaca organic farm, following more than 15 years of scientific survey and advocacy work.

Results

Lomas ecosystems form only where seasonal marine fog condenses on coastal hills, supporting plant and animal communities found nowhere else. Site surveys recorded 95 of the roughly 675 known lomas plant species at Amara y Ullujalla, of which about 40% are endemic and about 30% are threatened, including at least six critically endangered species such as the shrub Nolana willeana and the lichen Teloschistes peruensis, known from only a few hundred square metres.

Conclusions

The concession is the first legal protection granted specifically for a lomas site in Peru, where — together with Chile — only about 4% of this ecosystem type currently has any protected status. As a renewable, time-bound legal instrument tied to conservation performance rather than outright land purchase, the Concession for Conservation model is intended to be replicable at other unprotected lomas sites along the Peruvian coast, though no second site had been granted under this mechanism as of the source reporting.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No public budget figure is reported; the concession is a legal land-management instrument rather than a funded grant programme.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Renewable 30-year concession term granted April 2024, following a 15+ year pre-designation advocacy and survey phase.
Staffing & skills
Huarango Nature, local NGO managing the concession, SERFOR, Peru's National Forest and Wildlife Service, granting authority, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, scientific partner, Samaca organic farm, neighbouring community partner

Conditions for success

  • More than 15 years of scientific survey and advocacy work preceding the legal designation
  • A renewable, performance-tied legal concession mechanism rather than outright land purchase
  • Multi-partner structure combining a local NGO, an international scientific institution and a neighbouring community farm

Common failure modes

  • No second site had been granted under this mechanism as of the source reporting, so replicability remains unproven in practice
  • No post-designation conservation-outcome monitoring has yet been published given how recently (April 2024) the concession was granted

Where it fits

Governance type
national forestry-authority concession managed by an NGO-led partnership
Scale
site-level (6,449 hectares)
Income level
upper-middle-income (Peru)

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful