evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Brazil's Salary Transparency Law: Mandatory Biannual Pay-Gap Reporting

Brazil · Brasília · See the Brazil profile · See the Brasília profile

Top 45% 74/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Law 14.611/2023 requires Brazilian employers with 100+ staff to publish biannual salary-transparency reports. The March 2024 first cycle covered 49,587 establishments and 17.7 million workers, revealing a 19.4% average gender pay gap (32% for Black women).

Details

Promoter
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE)
Period
2023-present
Keywords
labour law, pay equity, corporate reporting, wage transparency

Description

Brazil's Law No. 14.611/2023 (Lei da Igualdade Salarial), enacted in July 2023, requires private employers with 100 or more employees to submit biannual salary-transparency reports to the Ministry of Labour and Employment (MTE), comparing pay between women and men performing work of equal value.
Reports are published every March and September; implementing rules under Decree 11.795/2023 and Ordinance 3.714/2023 set the reporting methodology. Where the MTE identifies unjustified pay gaps, the employer must submit a corrective action plan, developed jointly with unions and worker representatives, within 90 days of notification.
The first national report, released in March 2024, covered 49,587 establishments and 17.7 million workers. It found an average gender pay gap of 19.4%, rising to 25.2% for women in managerial roles and 32% for Black women — the first economy-wide, government-verified baseline of its kind in Brazil.
Because reporting only began in 2024, there is not yet independent evidence that the disclosure requirement itself narrows the measured gap over time; the mechanism's real test is whether the mandated corrective-action-plan process produces measurable closing gaps in subsequent reporting cycles.

Read the full analysis: https://relatoriodetransparenciasalarial.trabalho.gov.br/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful