evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Centros de Justicia para las Mujeres — Mexico's One-Stop Justice Centres for Women Survivors of Violence

Mexico · Mexico City · See the Mexico profile · See the Mexico City profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 32% 78/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Mexico's Centros de Justicia para las Mujeres co-locate prosecutors, women's institutes and support services in 76 centres across all 32 states, serving over 638,000 women in 2024 — though a 2026 review of 12 studies finds resourcing problems still limit effectiveness.

76
Operating centres nationally (mid-2025)
638,720
Women served (2024)
598,437
Women served (2023)
1,750
Women attending the network daily (current)
782
Women attending the network daily (2019, 55 centres)
Centros de Justicia para las Mujeres — Mexico's One-Stop Justice Centres for Women Survivors of Violence

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Comisión Nacional para Prevenir y Erradicar la Violencia contra las Mujeres (CONAVIM) / State Attorneys' Offices
Period
2010–present
Keywords
gender-based violence, one-stop justice, legal aid, victim support

Context

Mexico's Centros de Justicia para las Mujeres (CJM) are one-stop centres that co-locate a state prosecutor's office, psychological and legal support, and often a women's institute or government secretariat under one roof. Promoted nationally since around 2010, the model has grown to 76 operating centres across all 32 Mexican federal entities as of mid-2025, most commonly attached to state Attorneys General's offices (64% of centres).

Results

The centres now handle large volumes: INEGI's official CJM statistical programme put the number of women served in 2024 at 638,720, up from 598,437 in 2023, with roughly 1,750 women a day attending the network nationally — a rise of about 30% in daily attendance since 2019, when 782 women a day used the then 55 centres. Psychological violence is consistently the most-reported violence type, ahead of physical and sexual violence.

Conclusions

A 2026 SciELO literature review synthesising 12 academic studies (2014-2024) found that despite gender-perspective training for staff, effectiveness is compromised by institutional response limited by structure and budget, insufficient resources with weak civil-society participation, and institutional violence by public servants attributed to persistent androcentrism; a separate study found physical spaces often lack privacy and comfort. CJM is therefore a large, officially monitored model whose institutional reach has not automatically translated into consistently effective, survivor-centred practice.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Comisión Nacional para Prevenir y Erradicar la Violencia contra las Mujeres (CONAVIM), State Attorneys' Offices, state women's institutes and government secretariats

Conditions for success

  • co-location of prosecutor's office, psychological and legal support and a women's institute under one roof
  • gender-perspective training for staff

Common failure modes

  • effectiveness compromised by institutional response limited by structure and budget (Andrade Olvera, 2022)
  • insufficient economic and human resources with weak civil-society participation (Vásquez Ortuño, 2022)
  • institutional violence by public servants attributed to persistent androcentrism (Vargas Ocampo, 2019)
  • physical spaces often lack privacy and comfort

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful