evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Colombia's Contraloría Deploys ML Risk Model to Flag Pre-Election Public-Contracting Spikes

Colombia · Bogotá · See the Colombia profile · See the Bogotá profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 66% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Colombia's audit body applies ML models across 13,000+ linked data sources to flag anomalous public-contracting activity in real time — catching a 9-trillion-peso pre-election spending surge in Nov 2025, though no sanctions/recoveries are confirmed yet.

9.0 trillion COP
Public contracts committed in the flagged pre-election week (1-7 Nov 2025)
68 %
Share of that week's spending concentrated in a single day (Nov 2025)
190 %
Spike vs historical contracting patterns (Nov 2025)
14,414 worth 4.55 trillion COP
Contracts flagged in the 30 days after the presidential run-off (mid-2026)
22.5 %
Year-on-year increase in post-runoff contracting value (mid-2026)
Colombia's Contraloría Deploys ML Risk Model to Flag Pre-Election Public-Contracting Spikes

Details

Promoter
Contraloría General de la República de Colombia (DIARI) / Universidad de Antioquia
Period
May 2025 - ongoing
Keywords
public procurement, anti-corruption, predictive analytics, fiscal oversight

Context

On 19 May 2025, Colombia's Contraloría General de la República — the national supreme audit institution — launched a predictive analytics model, built with Universidad de Antioquia, to monitor public contracting for corruption risk, run by the Contraloría's Dirección de Información, Análisis y Reacción Inmediata (DIARI).

Objectives

Flag contractors with patterns such as repeated non-compliance, falsified insurance policies or premature contract settlements, and specifically watch for contracting abuse tied to Colombia's electoral-spending restrictions (Ley de Garantías Electorales).

Activities

The model applies decision-tree and random-forest techniques to more than 13,000 linked data sources, including historical SECOP I/II contracting records from 2014-2025, fiscal and disciplinary sanction registries, and consortium-membership data. A derivative tool, the Modelo Analítico de Seguimiento Preventivo, continuously watches contracting activity during electoral periods.

Results

In its first documented use, the Contraloría reported that in the week of 1-7 November 2025 — immediately before electoral restrictions took effect — 9.0 trillion pesos in public contracts were committed, with 6.1 trillion pesos (68% of that week's total) concentrated on a single day, a 190% spike against historical patterns, prompting a public alert. A follow-up run in mid-2026 flagged 14,414 contracts worth 4.55 trillion pesos signed in the 30 days after the presidential run-off, a 22.5% year-on-year increase, over 11,000 of them awarded without competitive bidding.

Conclusions

The evidence available is preventive and early-stage: no independent source confirms that contracts have been suspended, sanctions imposed, or funds recovered as a direct result of the alerts, and the Contraloría's own methodology and accuracy figures have not been independently audited.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Launched 19 May 2025; first documented alert covered the week of 1-7 November 2025; a follow-up run flagged contracts in mid-2026.
Staffing & skills
Contraloría's Dirección de Información, Análisis y Reacción Inmediata (DIARI), Universidad de Antioquia (model-development partner)

Conditions for success

  • Access to and linkage of 13,000+ historical data sources (SECOP I/II 2014-2025, fiscal/disciplinary sanction registries, consortium-membership data)
  • A defined escalation path to the Attorney General/Procuraduría for follow-up action

Common failure modes

  • The Contraloría's own technical documentation was inaccessible for independent verification, limiting external scrutiny of the model's methodology
  • No sanctions, contract suspensions, or fund recoveries have yet been publicly confirmed as resulting from the model's alerts

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful