evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Dhaka's Rooftop Gardens — Municipal Tax Rebates for Urban Agriculture Amid Missing Building-Code Rules

Bangladesh · Dhaka · See the Bangladesh profile · See the Dhaka profile

Top 99% 13/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Dhaka North City Corporation offers a 10% property-tax rebate for households maintaining rooftop gardens, and surveys count over 30,000 rooftop gardens across the city — but the practice remains unrecognised in the national building code, capping its growth.

Dhaka's Rooftop Gardens — Municipal Tax Rebates for Urban Agriculture Amid Missing Building-Code Rules

Details

Promoter
Dhaka North City Corporation (DNCC)
Period
2018-present
Keywords
urban agriculture, green roofs, municipal policy, food security

Description

Dhaka is one of the world's most densely populated megacities, with arable land shrinking rapidly at its edges; a Department of Agricultural Extension estimate puts the city's roof stock at over 450,000 rooftops covering roughly 5,000 hectares of unused space.
Since Bangladesh's 2018 National Agriculture Policy explicitly encouraged rooftop cultivation under "Specialised Agriculture," Dhaka North City Corporation (DNCC) has offered a 10% holding-tax rebate to residents who maintain rooftop gardens — a direct municipal financial incentive rather than a grant. City-tracked estimates put more than 30,000 rooftop gardens in operation, covering roughly 7% of the city's building-tops and growing around 45 varieties of fruit and vegetables.
Researchers and The Daily Star's investigative reporting find the practice remains legally unrecognised: the Bangladesh National Building Code has no rooftop-farming provisions, so new buildings are not designed to safely bear soil loads or drainage, and there are no density or floor-area-ratio (FAR) incentives for developers to accommodate it. Structural risk (dampness, damage) and low public awareness are cited as the main barriers to scaling beyond the current informal base.
This is a real, financially incentivised practice with tangible uptake, but it remains a municipal pilot-scale policy layered onto an unplanned, largely informal activity rather than a systematically monitored ecosystem-service programme; no city-wide data exists on stormwater retention, temperature, or biodiversity impact.

Read the full analysis: https://asianews.network/dhakas-rooftops-could-feed-the-city-but-law-keeps-getting-in-the-way/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful