ECMWF made its AIFS machine-learning weather model operational in February 2025, with a probabilistic version following in July — cutting compute needs by roughly 1,000x versus physics-based models while matching or beating them on measures including tropical cyclone tracks.
up to 20%
Tropical cyclone track accuracy improvement over physics-based model
~9%
Compute needed by comparable AI ensemble model vs. physics-based predecessor (NOAA AIGEFS)
Details
Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)
Period
2025–2026
Keywords
meteorology, weather forecasting, disaster risk reduction, public safety
Context
The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the intergovernmental body that runs the world's leading medium-range weather forecasting system for 35 member and cooperating states, put its Artificial Intelligence Forecasting System (AIFS) into full operational service in February 2025, with a probabilistic ensemble version following in July 2025.
Objectives
AIFS aims to produce global weather forecasts of comparable or better quality than ECMWF's physics-based Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) while cutting the computing power required, run alongside (not instead of) the physics-based system.
Activities
AIFS is a deep-learning model trained on ECMWF's own decades of reanalysis data. Once trained, it produces a 10-day global forecast in a fraction of the time and computing power required by the physics-based IFS.
Results
On independent verification scores, AIFS matches or outperforms physics-based forecasts on many measures, including gains of up to 20% on tropical cyclone track accuracy - a result confirmed in ECMWF's own published verification and covered independently by Communications of the ACM. NOAA's comparable AI ensemble model, AIGEFS, needs only about 9% of the compute of its physics-based predecessor. NOAA's own operational AI suite followed in January 2026, an early data point on cross-agency replication of the approach.
Conclusions
ECMWF still runs AIFS alongside, not instead of, the physics-based IFS, and forecasters caution that AI models trained on historical weather patterns are less proven for genuinely unprecedented extreme events.
Implementation
Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
ECMWF scientific and modelling teams, coordination with WMO and member/cooperating state meteorological agencies
Conditions for success
Decades of historical reanalysis data available for training
Existing physics-based forecasting system retained in parallel as a safeguard for unprecedented events
Independent verification and publication of comparative skill scores
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
A $12.7m Korean-funded project has installed an AI-assisted flood forecasting system and warning centre for the Pasig-Marikina-Tullahan river basins, intended …