evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Guernsey's WCAG 2.1 AA Standard for Government and Disability-Sector Digital Services

Guernsey · St Peter Port · See the Guernsey profile · See the St Peter Port profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 30% 88/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The States of Guernsey and the Guernsey Disability Alliance both adopted WCAG 2.1 AA as their accessibility benchmark; the government's own 2021 audit found MyGov only 'partially compliant', naming specific colour-contrast and ARIA-landmark failures.

Guernsey's WCAG 2.1 AA Standard for Government and Disability-Sector Digital Services

Details

Promoter
States of Guernsey (gov.gg / MyGov) & Guernsey Disability Alliance
Period
2021–present
Keywords
public sector, digital accessibility, disability rights, civil society

Context

The States of Guernsey adopted WCAG 2.1 Level AA as its target accessibility standard for government digital services, including gov.gg and the MyGov transactional portal, and the Guernsey Disability Alliance applies the same benchmark to its own "Access For All" site and advocacy work.

Objectives

To give Guernsey's government and disability sector a shared, named accessibility benchmark, and to be transparent — via a public accessibility statement — about where the government's own flagship transactional portal still falls short.

Activities

The government's accessibility statement for MyGov was tested in February 2021 using SiteImprove and WAVE.

Results

The statement discloses that MyGov is only "partially compliant" with WCAG 2.1 AA, naming specific unmet criteria: insufficient colour contrast in places (1.4.3 and 1.4.11) and missing ARIA landmarks for assistive-technology navigation (1.3.1). No subsequent published re-audit was found updating MyGov's compliance status beyond the 2021 statement.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
States of Guernsey digital services team (gov.gg / MyGov), Guernsey Disability Alliance running its own "Access For All" accessibility benchmark

Conditions for success

  • Adopting a single named standard (WCAG 2.1 AA) shared between government and civil society so both are measured against the same bar
  • Using automated testing tools (SiteImprove, WAVE) to produce a documented, criterion-level accessibility statement rather than a vague compliance claim
  • An independent civil-society reference point (Guernsey Disability Alliance) applying the same benchmark to hold government accountable

Common failure modes

  • The government's own core transactional portal (MyGov) was only "partially compliant" at last public disclosure, with named, unresolved contrast and ARIA-landmark gaps
  • No published re-audit was found after February 2021, so the current compliance status cannot be confirmed

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful