From 2016 to 2023, Bristol City Council and Avon and Somerset Police ran predictive risk-scoring models for child exploitation. A review called them the 'weakest element' of the programme — victims scored lower than burglary suspects — and no records explain the shutdown.
~1,000 children
Children in Barnardo's known abuse-history dataset combined into the Think Family database
Details
Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Bristol City Council & Avon and Somerset Police (Insight Bristol)
Period
2016–2023 (decommissioned)
Keywords
child protection, policing, predictive analytics, data sharing
Context
Insight Bristol was a joint data-analytics unit set up in 2015 by Bristol City Council and Avon and Somerset Police, combining police, council, school, housing and charity records -- including data from Barnardo's on roughly 1,000 children with a known history of abuse -- into a shared 'Think Family' database.
Objectives
From around 2016 the unit built two predictive risk-scoring models -- one for child sexual exploitation (CSE) and one for child criminal exploitation (CCE) -- to help identify children at risk, using variables such as housing support, rent arrears, free-school-meal eligibility, school absences, missing-person reports and mental-health concerns; gender and ethnicity were excluded from the scores.
Activities
The CSE and CCE models were used operationally from around 2016. In 2023 the council concluded they were 'not fit for operational use' and quietly decommissioned them.
Results
A subsequent review by Social Finance, reported by the Bristol Cable in 2026, found the models were the 'weakest element' of the programme: known victims of sexual exploitation sometimes scored lower than people involved in burglaries, some vulnerable children did not appear in the results at all, and frontline staff reported low confidence in the scores. Reviewers could not fully audit the models because the source code and list of variables could not be located, and neither the council nor the police retained records explaining why the models were withdrawn.
Conclusions
England's Children's Commissioner, Dame Rachel de Souza, called the findings 'deeply concerning' and said predictive tools used on children 'must be transparent [and] well understood by professionals.' The UK's Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) has since cited predictive-analytics cases like this one as evidence of the risks of unaudited algorithmic profiling in child protection, while the OECD's Observatory of Public Sector Innovation had earlier profiled Insight Bristol's broader data-sharing work without flagging these specific model failures -- a reminder of how hard such flaws can be to detect from outside.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Operated from around 2016 until decommissioning in 2023; the Social Finance review and public reporting followed in 2026.
Staffing & skills
Joint Insight Bristol data-analytics unit staff (Bristol City Council & Avon and Somerset Police), Frontline social work and policing staff using the risk scores
Conditions for success
Reliable retention of source code, variable lists and decision records to allow independent audit
Frontline staff confidence in and understanding of the scores
Excluding protected characteristics such as gender and ethnicity from scoring variables
Common failure modes
Known CSE victims sometimes scored lower than burglary suspects
Some vulnerable children did not appear in the results at all
Frontline staff reported low confidence in the scores
Source code and variable list could not be located, preventing a full audit
Neither the council nor police retained records explaining why the models were withdrawn
Council concluded the models were 'not fit for operational use' and quietly decommissioned them in 2023
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.