evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Kenya Tax Model (RIAPA-AI) — KIPPRA's AI-Chat-Driven Computable General Equilibrium Platform for Tax Policy Simulation

Kenya · Nairobi · See the Kenya profile

Kenya's KIPPRA, its Revenue Authority (KRA) and IFPRI built an AI-chat computable general equilibrium model for tax simulation; a 2024 run projected a proposed 5% farm-produce withholding tax would push over 106,000 more Kenyans into poverty.

106,313 people
Projected increase in national poverty (proposed 5% withholding tax, no revenue recycling)
109,805 people
Projected increase in rural poverty
19,832 people
Projected increase in undernourished population nationally
+0.02%
Projected change in overall GDP
-0.05%
Projected change in agricultural GDP (no revenue recycling)
+1.07%
Projected change in agricultural GDP (if new revenue recycled into agricultural investment)
Kenya Tax Model (RIAPA-AI) — KIPPRA's AI-Chat-Driven Computable General Equilibrium Platform for Tax Policy Simulation

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA), with the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) and IFPRI/CGIAR
Period
2024–ongoing (model co-created 2024; in active policy use through 2025–2026)
Keywords
policy simulation, tax policy analysis, computable general equilibrium modelling, evidence-based policymaking

Context

In 2024 the Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA), a state corporation under Kenya's National Treasury and Planning, co-created the Kenya Tax Model with the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI/CGIAR). It is built on IFPRI's RIAPA computable general equilibrium (CGE) platform, with a chat-driven natural-language interface (RIAPA-AI), and now sits within KIPPRA's Economic Modelling Hub.

Objectives

To let policymakers run tax and trade policy simulations without operating specialised CGE modelling software, so that proposed measures can be assessed for their poverty, nutrition and growth effects before enactment.

Activities

The model was applied to a real proposed policy: a 5% withholding tax on agricultural produce sold through cooperatives. The simulation results were presented on 5 April 2024 to a stakeholder workshop including KRA, county governments, the National Cereals and Produce Board and farmer cooperatives.

Results

Without revenue recycling, the simulation projected a national poverty increase of 106,313 people, a rural poverty increase of 109,805 people, and 19,832 more undernourished people nationally; overall GDP would rise a marginal 0.02% while agricultural GDP would fall 0.05%. Agricultural GDP was projected to rise 1.07% instead if the new tax revenue were recycled into agricultural investment. KRA was reportedly open to refining the proposal in light of the evidence.

Conclusions

The quantitative results are developer-published by KIPPRA/IFPRI/CGIAR rather than externally audited, and the underlying analysis itself flagged data gaps around cooperative sales volumes requiring incidence assumptions. No source confirms whether the withholding tax was ultimately dropped, modified or enacted as a direct result of the modelling — only that the findings reached policymakers. The 'AI' element is a natural-language interface on top of a conventional CGE model rather than a machine-learning system in itself.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Built on an existing IFPRI CGE platform (RIAPA) rather than developed from scratch; cost is largely staff time within KIPPRA's Economic Modelling Hub plus IFPRI/CGIAR technical collaboration — not itemised in source.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Model co-created in 2024 and in active policy use through 2025-2026, per the source period.
Staffing & skills
KIPPRA modelling economists (Economic Modelling Hub), Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) policy staff, IFPRI/CGIAR CGE modelling technical team

Conditions for success

  • Tri-institutional partnership (KIPPRA, KRA, IFPRI) providing institutional backing
  • Chat-driven interface lowering the technical barrier for policymakers to run scenarios
  • Stakeholder workshops (e.g. 5 April 2024) to present findings directly to affected parties such as county governments and cooperatives

Common failure modes

  • Data gaps around cooperative sales volumes required incidence assumptions, flagged by the analysis itself
  • Results are developer-published, not externally audited
  • No confirmed link between the modelling and an actual policy decision

Where it fits

Governance type
national government agency / state corporation, in partnership with an international research institute
Scale
national
Income level
low/middle-income (Kenya)

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful