evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Lexend — A Spacing-Based Open Font Family for Reading Fluency, Released on Google Fonts, With Contested Evidence

United States of America · Azusa · See the United States of America profile

Top 55% 72/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Lexend is an open variable font family designed around wider letter spacing to ease reading. Creator-led tests are positive, but independent reviews find no proven benefit for 'dyslexia fonts' generally.

Lexend — A Spacing-Based Open Font Family for Reading Fluency, Released on Google Fonts, With Contested Evidence

Details

Promoter
Dr. Bonnie Shaver-Troup / Google Fonts
Period
2004–
Keywords
inclusive design, typography, reading, dyslexia, open font

Description

Dr. Bonnie Shaver-Troup began Lexend in 2004, commissioning type designer Linnea Lundquist; it launched on Google Fonts in August 2019 after Google Fonts funded Thomas Jockin to digitise it as a variable font. It comes in seven width families (Deca to Zetta), with nine weights added in 2021. The design premise is that tight letter spacing causes crowding and masking problems for readers.
The evidence is mixed and mostly creator-led: Shaver-Troup's doctoral work tested font spacing with second graders, and secondary sources report small positive results, but Google's own article gives no sample sizes or quantified results and states that Google does not endorse its claims. Independent research cautions against assuming typeface fixes reading difficulty: a peer-reviewed study found the Dyslexie font did not benefit reading in children with or without dyslexia, and systematic reviews have found no robust evidence for dyslexia-specific fonts.
Practical reading: free and low-cost to offer as a user-selectable option, but not a substitute for evidence-based reading instruction.

Read the full analysis: https://design.google/library/lexend-readability

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful