evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Morocco ANEF Compensations pour Mise en Défens — National State Forest Deferred-Grazing PES

Morocco · Rabat · See the Morocco profile · See the Rabat profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 64% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Morocco CMD (est. 1999, op. 2002) pays rural pastoral associations via the National Forest Fund to defer grazing from state forests under regeneration; covers ~15,453 ha in Mâamora cork-oak forest—the first national-scale PES mechanism in the Arab world.

796
Forest violations recorded in Mâamora (2007)
505
Forest violations recorded in Mâamora (2008)
15,453 ha
Area under CMD contracts in Mâamora forest
76 %
Share of targeted Mâamora area under CMD
29,000 households
Households affected in the Mâamora management unit
1.7 € billion/year
Estimated annual value of Morocco's forest ecosystem services
Morocco ANEF Compensations pour Mise en Défens — National State Forest Deferred-Grazing PES

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Agence Nationale des Eaux et Forêts (ANEF), Kingdom of Morocco
Period
2002–ongoing
Keywords
government, forest, agro-pastoral, state PES, semi-arid

Context

The Compensations pour Mise en Défens (CMD) is Morocco's foundational payment-for-ecosystem-services instrument, established by ministerial decree on 30 June 1999 and brought into force on 21 March 2002 under the Haut Commissariat aux Eaux et Forêts (now the Agence Nationale des Eaux et Forêts, ANEF). Under the CMD, the state pays rural communities organised into formally constituted pastoral associations or cooperatives to refrain from exercising traditional grazing rights on degraded state forests undergoing plantation or natural regeneration, financed through the National Forest Fund (Fonds National Forestier), which draws on taxes on commercial forest product revenues.

Objectives

The programme aims to allow degraded state forests to regenerate — notably the Mâamora cork-oak forest east of Rabat, one of the world's largest natural cork-oak forests — while protecting the Sebou River watershed and reducing soil erosion in a semi-arid landscape.

Activities

In the Mâamora forest, approximately 15,453 hectares (76% of the targeted area) were placed under CMD contracts, affecting an estimated 29,000 households and 150,000 individuals across the roughly 132,000-hectare Mâamora management unit, with nearly 20 pastoral associations formally constituted there.

Results

Compliance improved measurably: recorded forest violations (procès-verbaux) in the area declined from 796 in 2007 to 505 in 2008. The CMD is also reported to contribute to watershed protection for the Sebou basin and to soil erosion reduction; Morocco's forests overall are valued at approximately €1.7 billion per year in ecosystem services nationally.

Conclusions

The CMD is described as the first nationally scaled, legally grounded PES mechanism in the Arab world and a rare documented case from the MENA region, though no independent, quantified evaluation of its ecological outcomes (beyond violation counts) was found in the cited literature.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Financed through the National Forest Fund via taxes on commercial forest product revenues; no specific total budget figure was found in the source material.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Decreed in 1999, in force since 2002 and still operating (2002-ongoing); forest regeneration and compliance outcomes are assessed over a multi-year to multi-decade horizon.
Staffing & skills
ANEF (Agence Nationale des Eaux et Forêts) forest administration staff, Formally constituted rural pastoral associations and cooperatives

Conditions for success

  • A legal/decree-based framework (1999 decree, in force 2002) giving payments institutional standing
  • Dedicated financing via the National Forest Fund, funded by taxes on commercial forest product revenues
  • Formal constitution of pastoral associations (nearly 20 in Mâamora alone) to organise and represent grazing-rights holders

Common failure modes

  • No embedded carbon or biodiversity monitoring, so ecological benefits beyond violation counts are not independently verified

Where it fits

Governance type
national government programme
Scale
regional (132,000 ha Mâamora management unit)
Income level
lower-middle income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful