Colorado Equal Pay for Equal Work Act (2021) — Mandatory Salary Transparency and Pay Equity
United States of America
Colorado's Equal Pay for Equal Work Act (SB19-085), in force since 1 January 2021, requires all employers to disclose salary …
United States of America · New York City · See the United States of America profile
NYC's Local Law 144 (2021), the first law to require bias audits of AI hiring tools by sex and race, took effect July 2023. A 2024 study of 391 employers found only 4.6% posted audit reports; a 2025 state audit called enforcement 'ineffective'.
New York City's Local Law 144, enacted in December 2021 and enforced from July 2023, requires any employer using an Automated Employment Decision Tool (AEDT) — algorithmic software used to screen, score or rank candidates — to commission an independent annual bias audit. The audit must calculate selection and scoring rates broken down by sex, race/ethnicity and their intersections, publish a summary on the employer's website, and notify candidates that an AEDT is in use with the right to request an alternative process. It was the first law globally to mandate algorithmic bias audits for hiring.
Independent evidence of the law's real-world performance is mixed to poor. A peer-reviewed FAccT 2024 study ('Null Compliance'), in which 155 student investigators tracked 391 New York employers, found only 18 (about 4.6%) had posted a bias audit report and just 13 (about 3.3%) had posted the required transparency notice. The researchers coined the term 'null compliance' because the law gives employers wide discretion over whether their tool is even in scope, making it impossible to tell missing disclosures apart from lawful exemptions.
A New York State Comptroller audit released in December 2025 corroborated this picture at the regulator level: it found 75% of test calls to the city's 311 hotline about AEDT complaints were misrouted and never reached DCWP, that DCWP's own review of 32 posted bias audits found only one compliance issue where the Comptroller's auditors found at least 17, and that DCWP received only two formal AEDT complaints in the two-year audit period despite penalties of $500–$1,500 per violation being available. The Comptroller concluded DCWP's enforcement was 'ineffective.'
The law remains significant as a first-mover model that explicitly frames algorithmic hiring bias as a sex- and race-equity issue, and it has shaped subsequent AI-hiring proposals elsewhere. But the documented evidence to date is a cautionary case: transparency-only, employer-self-scoped regulation has not yet produced verifiable compliance or measurable bias reduction.
Read the full analysis: https://www.nyc.gov/site/dca/about/automated-employment-decision-tools.page
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United States of America
Colorado's Equal Pay for Equal Work Act (SB19-085), in force since 1 January 2021, requires all employers to disclose salary …
United Kingdom
Since April 2017, all UK employers with ≥250 staff must publish annual gender pay gap data. Over 10,700 employers now …
Iceland
Iceland's 2018 law made it the world's first country to require all employers with 25+ workers to certify gender-equal pay …
New Zealand
NZD 2 billion pay equity settlement for 55,000 predominantly-female care and support workers, enacted June 2017. Wages rose 15-50% (minimum-wage …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.