Latvia's State Audit Office AI Review — 17% of State Institutions Use AI, 55% Have No Plan, and Nobody Tracks Results
Latvia
A survey of 83 Latvian state institutions found 17% use AI, 22% plan to and 55% have no clear plan; …
United States of America · Albany · See the United States of America profile
Top 74% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
An April 2025 audit of the state's AI policy and four agencies found no statewide AI inventory, only two sentences on bias, no formal inventories at any agency and no governance policy at three of four.
On 3 April 2025 the New York State Comptroller published an audit of how the state governs artificial intelligence. It examined the Office of Information Technology Services' (ITS) January 2024 AI policy and AI use at four agencies: the Office for the Aging, the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, the Department of Motor Vehicles and the Department of Transportation.
Auditors found insufficient central guidance and oversight to verify that AI systems are reliable and accurate. More than a year after the policy was issued, ITS had no inventory of AI systems in use by state entities. The policy contained only two sentences on bias management and left agencies free to decide what counts as responsible use.
None of the four agencies kept a formal AI inventory and three lacked internal AI governance policies. Only the DMV had risk-assessment policies, yet it exempted its facial-recognition system from oversight.
The audit made seven recommendations: strengthen the policy with adoption guidance, add training and oversight, build agency-level governance structures, and have the DMV review its facial-recognition system. ITS said it was reviewing them and developing training; three agencies agreed to create governance structures, while the DMV disagreed with the findings but accepted the recommendations. The Comptroller said he would advance a bill requiring regular independent audits of state agencies' AI governance. This is an audit of governance gaps, not a demonstration of improved outcomes, so evidence of impact is limited.
Read the full analysis: https://www.osc.ny.gov/press/releases/2025/04/dinapoli-improved-guidance-needed-state-agencies-using-ai-avoid-risks
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Latvia
A survey of 83 Latvian state institutions found 17% use AI, 22% plan to and 55% have no clear plan; …
Australia
Canberra required 94 federal agencies to publish AI-use transparency statements by 28 Feb 2025. The Digital Transformation Agency says all …
Norway
Since 2021, Norway's data protection authority has run about 20 time-boxed AI sandbox projects with public bodies — from NAV's …
Ireland
Ireland's May 2025 guidelines set seven principles, a Decision Framework and a 'Responsible AI Canvas' for public bodies considering AI, …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.