evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Nicosia's Green Line — a divided city's buffer zone turned de facto wildlife corridor

Cyprus · Nicosia · See the Cyprus profile · See the Nicosia profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 96% 20/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Cyprus's UN-patrolled buffer zone bisecting Nicosia, off-limits to construction since 1974, has become an unplanned wildlife refuge: a 2007 UNDP-backed survey recorded 358 plant, 100+ bird and 18 mammal species, and it now shelters up to 3,000 Cyprus mouflon.

358
Plant species documented (2007 survey)
100+
Bird species documented (2007 survey)
18
Mammal species documented (2007 survey)
2,500-3,000
Cyprus mouflon population
Nicosia's Green Line — a divided city's buffer zone turned de facto wildlife corridor

Details

Promoter
UN Development Programme (UNDP) Cyprus
Period
1974–present (biodiversity survey 2007)
Region (NUTS)
CY000
Keywords
biodiversity conservation, urban wildlife corridor, buffer zone ecology, post-conflict rewilding

Context

Since the 1974 division of Cyprus, a UN-patrolled buffer zone up to several hundred metres wide has run through the heart of Nicosia and across the island, closed to construction, farming and most human activity.

Results

In 2007, a joint Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot scientific team, supported by UNDP, documented 358 plant species, more than 100 bird species and 18 mammal species in the zone. Separately, the Cyprus Game and Fauna Service's monitoring scheme (running since 1997) has tracked the island's mouflon population recovering to roughly 2,500-3,000 animals, with a significant share sheltering inside the buffer zone.

Conclusions

UNDP environmental officer Nicolas Jarraud has called the strip a de facto wildlife corridor, but the protection is an unplanned by-product of political stalemate, not a designed conservation programme: there is no dedicated management authority, no recurring funding and no certification, and the habitat's future depends entirely on a political situation that could change without warning.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No dedicated conservation budget identified; monitoring carried out via UNDP-backed surveys and a government fauna-monitoring scheme.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Buffer zone in place since 1974; biodiversity survey conducted 2007; mouflon monitoring ongoing since 1997.
Staffing & skills
UN Development Programme (UNDP) Cyprus, joint Greek-Cypriot/Turkish-Cypriot scientific survey team, Cyprus Game and Fauna Service (mouflon monitoring)

Conditions for success

  • sustained restriction of construction, farming and human activity within the buffer zone

Common failure modes

  • no dedicated management authority, recurring funding or certification -- protection is contingent on an unresolved political situation that could change without warning

Where it fits

Governance type
UN peacekeeping buffer zone, not a designed conservation authority
Scale
national (Cyprus buffer zone)
Income level
high income (Cyprus/EU)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful