evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Peru's PETT/COFOPRI Joint Land Titling — Formalising Spousal Co-Ownership

Peru · Cusco · See the Peru profile

Peru's PETT/COFOPRI land-titling programme put both spouses' names on rural titles from the 1990s. A 2013 quasi-experimental study found joint titling raised women's household decision-making by 5-15 points in four highland regions, though benefits skewed toward men in practice.

70.2%
Household decision participation, women in joint-titled communities
64.9%
Household decision participation, comparison communities
15.5 percentage points
Regression-adjusted participation gap
17-25 percentage points
Gap in investment/agricultural decisions
~900,000
PETT Phase I titles issued (by 2001)
1,098,078
PETT Phase II titles issued
831,348
PETT Phase II titles registered
57%
Parcels formalised as joint titles nationally
11.4 hours/week
Labour-supply gain from urban titling (men)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Programa Especial de Titulación de Tierras (PETT) / COFOPRI
Period
1993–2007 (PETT); merged into COFOPRI, 2007–present
Keywords
land tenure, property rights, rural development, household decision-making

Context

From 1993, Peru's rural land-titling programme (PETT) registered land parcels nationwide, and from 2000 it adopted joint spousal titling as standard practice for conjugal-society land under Legislative Decree 667; PETT was financed mainly through Inter-American Development Bank loans and merged into the agency COFOPRI in 2007.

Results

Henrik Wiig's quasi-experimental study (World Development, 2013), surveying 1,280 rural households across 69 communities in four highland departments, found women in communities with joint-titled land participated in 70.2% of household decisions versus 64.9% in comparison communities, a gap that widened to 15.5 points once regression-adjusted; the effect concentrated in investment and agricultural decisions (17-25 points). Nationally, PETT is reported to have formalised 57% of roughly 1.5 million parcels as joint titles; Phase I issued about 900,000 titles by 2001 and Phase II issued 1,098,078 titles (831,348 registered).

Conclusions

An FAO review states that titling's effects on women's bargaining power are "difficult to trace" and that implementation "has so far largely favoured men"; no study, including Wiig's, was found to measure any effect on domestic violence, and PETT's first phase (1993-2000) excluded many women lacking the identity documents titling required.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful