evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Phoenix Islands Protected Area — Reverse Fishing Licence Trust Fund

Kiribati · Kanton · See the Kiribati profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 96% 20/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Kiribati closed 408,250 km² of ocean to fishing in 2015, financed by a PIPA Trust endowment meant to offset lost licence revenue. The fund raised only ~US$7M against a $13.5M target, and in 2021 Kiribati reopened PIPA after citing tens of millions in foregone revenue.

408,250 km²
Protected ocean area
US$13.5 million
Trust fund target (2014 second phase)
~US$7 million
Trust fund raised by 2021
~US$550,000
Annual core management cost
8%
Fishing-licence demand decline since 2015 closure
US$60-140 million
Estimated lost purse-seine revenue through 2021
US$5.9 million
Estimated lost long-line revenue through 2021
>70%
Share of government revenue from fishing licences
Phoenix Islands Protected Area — Reverse Fishing Licence Trust Fund

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Government of Kiribati / PIPA Conservation Trust / Conservation International / New England Aquarium
Period
2008-present
Keywords
marine protected area, conservation trust fund, reverse fishing licence, ocean finance, blue economy

Context

The Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA) was formally established by Kiribati in 2008 (building on 2006 regulations), enlarged to cover 408,250 km² of ocean, and inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2010.

Activities

To finance it without simply forgoing revenue, Kiribati, Conservation International and the New England Aquarium designed a "reverse fishing licence" mechanism: a PIPA Conservation Trust endowment whose interest income would compensate the government for the foreign tuna-fleet licence fees it gave up as more of the area was closed to commercial fishing under a Conservation Contract. In 2015, Kiribati went further and declared PIPA a full no-take zone, at the time one of the largest fully protected marine areas on Earth.

Results

But the financing mechanism never caught up with that ambition: by its 2014 second-phase target the Trust aimed to raise $13.5 million, and core management costs alone ran to roughly $550,000 a year, leaving little of the endowment's interest available as actual compensation. By 2021 the endowment had raised only about US$7 million. An independent panel found that demand for Kiribati's fishing licences had fallen 8% since the 2015 closure, translating into an estimated $60-140 million in lost purse-seine revenue and $5.9 million in lost long-line revenue through 2021 — for a country where fishing licences supply more than 70% of government revenue.

Conclusions

Citing this shortfall and the Trust's inability to deliver the promised compensation, the Government of Kiribati lifted PIPA's no-take closure in November 2021, shifting to a Marine Spatial Planning approach that again permits some commercial fishing. PIPA is best read as an honest cautionary case for ecosystem-service finance: a legally and institutionally sophisticated reverse-payment mechanism, endorsed by major conservation NGOs and a UNESCO listing, that nonetheless could not raise enough capital to match the real economic value it asked a small island state to forgo.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Trust fund target US$13.5 million (2014 second phase); ~US$7 million raised by 2021; core management costs ~US$550,000/year.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Established 2008, enlarged and UNESCO-listed 2010, full no-take zone declared 2015, closure lifted November 2021.
Staffing & skills
Government of Kiribati, PIPA Conservation Trust, Conservation International, New England Aquarium

Conditions for success

  • Legally and institutionally sophisticated reverse-payment (reverse fishing licence) mechanism endorsed by major conservation NGOs and a UNESCO World Heritage listing

Common failure modes

  • Trust endowment raised only ~US$7 million against a US$13.5 million target, leaving little available as compensation after ~US$550,000/year management costs
  • Estimated US$60-140 million in lost purse-seine revenue and US$5.9 million in lost long-line revenue through 2021, for a country where fishing licences supply more than 70% of government revenue
  • Government reversed the full no-take closure in November 2021, shifting to a Marine Spatial Planning approach that again permits some commercial fishing

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful