In 2018 Salta province (Argentina) and Microsoft built a predictive-analytics algorithm claiming to flag named girls "predestined" for teen pregnancy using ethnicity and poverty data — widely condemned, never independently audited, now a textbook AI-governance cautionary case.
86%
Claimed accuracy (unverified, publicly stated by governor)
Details
Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Ministerio de Primera Infancia (Salta Province), with Microsoft and Fundación CONIN
In 2018, the government of Salta Province in northern Argentina, through its Ministerio de Primera Infancia, partnered with Microsoft and the anti-abortion NGO Fundación CONIN to build a predictive-analytics system intended to identify, years in advance, which named adolescent girls were most likely to become pregnant or drop out of school.
Objectives
The stated aim was to flag high-risk households and individuals for early intervention using demographic scoring.
Activities
The model scored households using demographic variables including age, ethnicity, disability status, nationality, and whether the home had hot running water. Provincial 'territorial agents' then visited flagged families, photographing residents and recording GPS coordinates, feeding results back into the system.
Results
Then-governor Juan Manuel Urtubey publicly claimed the model was '86% accurate,' but no methodology, validation data, or outcome evaluation was ever published or independently verified.
Conclusions
The programme drew condemnation from digital-rights researchers and academics for profiling minors by ethnicity and poverty markers without consent, transparency, or oversight, and for its ties to an anti-abortion advocacy group during Argentina's national abortion-law debate. It was quietly abandoned without a public accounting of results, and is now catalogued as a formal AI incident and analysed in peer-reviewed literature as an example of unaudited predictive profiling in social policy — illustrating why claimed accuracy figures from vendors or officials cannot substitute for independent evaluation.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
Ministerio de Primera Infancia (Salta Province), Microsoft as technology partner, Fundación CONIN (anti-abortion NGO) as delivery partner, Provincial 'territorial agents' conducting household visits
Common failure modes
No methodology, validation data, or outcome evaluation ever published despite a public accuracy claim
Profiling of minors by ethnicity and poverty markers without consent or transparency
Undisclosed partnership with an anti-abortion advocacy group during a politically sensitive national debate
No independent ethics review or oversight body; the programme was quietly abandoned without public accounting
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.