evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

PSDA Service Lab — Co-Designing Georgia's 112 Emergency Service with Deaf Citizens

Georgia · Tbilisi · See the Georgia profile · See the Tbilisi profile

Top 39% 76/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Georgia's public-service innovation lab ran a design-thinking process with the Union of Deaf of Georgia to rebuild the national 112 emergency line, producing a free 24/7 SMS/video-relay service that won a 2016 EENA award for disability inclusion.

Details

Promoter
Public Service Development Agency (PSDA) Service Lab, with UNDP Georgia and the Union of Deaf of Georgia
Period
2014–2015 design and launch; service ongoing
Keywords
emergency services, digital government, service design, disability inclusion

Description

Since 2014, Georgia's Public Service Development Agency (PSDA) has run an internal "Service Lab" to redesign public services around the people who use them. Working with UNDP Georgia and support from the Swedish government, the Service Lab ran a seven-month process to rebuild the national 112 emergency line for citizens who are Deaf or hard of hearing. Staff from the 112 centre travelled to Ireland to study accessible emergency-response models, then ran a three-day design-thinking workshop with the Union of Deaf of Georgia, technologists and civil-society groups, using a step-by-step simulation of a real emergency call to surface exactly where the existing system failed Deaf callers.
The redesigned service launched nationwide in March 2015: a free, 24/7 SMS and video-relay channel connecting Deaf and hard-of-hearing callers to 112 operators trained in Georgian Sign Language, requiring prior registration for identity verification. In 2016 the European Emergency Number Association (EENA) recognised the service with its award for Best Innovative Efforts in Disability Support, presented in Prague to over 600 delegates from 82 countries — external validation that the co-designed service met a real, previously unmet need.
The evidence base is descriptive rather than evaluative: no independent study of how many Deaf citizens actually use the service, or their satisfaction, was found, and much of the process documentation comes from UNDP, which co-funded the project. The award and the service's continued operation since 2015 are the strongest available proxies for effectiveness.

Read the full analysis: https://eena.org/knowledge-hub/news/112-app-georgia/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful