evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Program

United States of America · St. Paul · See the United States of America profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 47% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 1986 Minnesota has paid landowners a one-time fee for easements retiring marginal cropland, wetlands and prairie. State agency BWSR reports over $200M has secured 250,000+ acres across 6,000+ easements, funded chiefly via the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment.

200 USD million+
Cumulative state funds secured (1986-present)
250,000+ acres
Acres protected (1986-present)
6,000+ easements
Easements (1986-present)
7,276 acres
RIM-WRP Phase 1 acres protected (2009-2012)
343 jobs
RIM-WRP Phase 1 jobs sustained (USDA estimate) (FY2010)
Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Program

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR)
Period
1986-present
Keywords
agriculture, water quality, wetlands, wildlife habitat, conservation easements

Context

Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve is a state conservation-easement programme created by the Reinvest in Minnesota Resources Act of 1986 (Minn. Stat. §§103F.505-103F.531), administered by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) with delivery through county Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs).

Objectives

Retire marginal cropland, wetlands and prairie from farming and restore conservation cover, protecting water quality and wildlife habitat while keeping land in private ownership and on the tax rolls.

Activities

Landowners receive a one-time payment, calculated from township average land values or a share of tax-assessed value, in exchange for a permanent or long-term easement. Funding comes chiefly from the Outdoor Heritage Fund and Clean Water Fund created by the 2008 Clean Water, Land and Legacy constitutional amendment, plus the Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund, state bonding and federal partnerships such as USDA NRCS's Wetlands Reserve Program (delivered jointly as RIM-WRP).

Results

Cumulatively, more than $200 million in state funds have secured over 6,000 easements on more than 250,000 acres since the programme began. A documented tranche, RIM-WRP Phase 1 (FY2010), allocated $9,059,500 in Outdoor Heritage Fund money, leveraged over $12.6 million in federal WRP funds, and paid landowners $6.3 million to protect 7,276 acres (2,423 wetland and 4,853 upland) across 63 easements between July 2009 and June 2012 — USDA estimated the work sustained 343 jobs. A BWSR project profile for one lake-restoration easement cluster documents over two tons of sediment, 16 pounds of phosphorus and six million gallons of annual runoff kept out of area lakes, illustrating the programme's water-quality logic rather than a statewide total.

Conclusions

RIM has real limitations. An agricultural-press column (Agweek) argues its permanent easements bind future landowners who received no compensation, sometimes removing high-yield farmland from production for good, with no re-evaluation mechanism beyond the initial 15-20 year impact window. The RIM-WRP Phase 1 tranche itself returned $1.14 million unspent, pointing to enrollment friction. No independent, peer-reviewed evaluation of statewide water-quality or wildlife outcomes could be located.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — One-time per-acre payment calculated from township average land values or a share of tax-assessed value; cumulative $200M+ in state funds since 1986, plus federal leverage (e.g. $12.6M federal WRP funds in one tranche).
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Permanent or long-term (15-20 year minimum impact window) easements; programme running continuously since 1986.
Staffing & skills
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) state staff, County Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs) — local delivery and administration, USDA NRCS (joint delivery of RIM-WRP tranches)

Conditions for success

  • Dedicated, constitutionally protected funding stream (Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment)
  • Local delivery through county SWCDs close to landowners
  • Federal cost-share leverage via the USDA NRCS Wetlands Reserve Program partnership

Common failure modes

  • Permanent easements can bind future landowners who received no compensation, removing high-yield farmland from production with no re-evaluation mechanism (Agweek critique)
  • Enrollment friction — RIM-WRP Phase 1 returned $1.14 million unspent
  • No independent verification of statewide water-quality or wildlife outcomes

Where it fits

Governance type
state government programme with county-level delivery
Scale
state-wide (Minnesota)
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful