evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Stepping Stones (Eastern Cape) — South Africa's Cluster-Randomised Trial of a 50-Hour Gender and HIV Programme for Young People

South Africa · Mthatha · See the South Africa profile

Top 67% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Cluster RCT in 70 Eastern Cape clusters (1,360 men, 1,416 women, aged 15–26): no effect on HIV (IRR 0.95) but HSV-2 incidence fell (RR 0.67) and men's reported IPV perpetration was lower (24-month OR 0.62, borderline p=0.054); no benefit for women.

Stepping Stones (Eastern Cape) — South Africa's Cluster-Randomised Trial of a 50-Hour Gender and HIV Programme for Young People

Details

Promoter
South African Medical Research Council with Eastern Cape Department of Health
Period
2002–2006 (trial); published 2008
Keywords
intimate partner violence, HIV prevention, gender-transformative, youth, participatory learning

Description

Stepping Stones is a participatory programme of about 50 hours, delivered in single-sex peer groups and cross-gender sessions, building skills in communication, relationships and gender norms. This trial compared it with a three-hour session on HIV and safer sex in 70 clusters (64 villages and six townships) of the Eastern Cape, South Africa, enrolling 1,360 men and 1,416 women aged 15–26, mostly in school, with follow-up at about 12 and 24 months.
Results were mixed. HIV incidence did not differ (adjusted IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.67–1.35), while HSV-2 incidence was lower (RR 0.67). Fewer men reported perpetrating intimate partner violence more than once: 11.4% vs 14.9% at 12 months (aOR 0.73, 0.50–1.06) and 6.2% vs 9.6% at 24 months (aOR 0.62, 0.38–1.01, p=0.054) — a consistent direction but borderline statistical significance at each time point. Women's reported experience of IPV did not differ, and women reported more transactional sex at 12 months.
The authors concluded the programme did not reduce HIV, but changed several risk behaviours among men. It is a cautionary example: well-evaluated, widely adapted, with a modest and mainly male-side behavioural signal, no measured benefit for women, and no cost data. Behaviour data are self-reported.

Read the full analysis: https://www.endvawnow.org/uploads/browser/files/Evaluation_StepStones_Jewkes_BMJ_2008.pdf

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful