evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

STT's Machine-Learning Risk Model for Public-Procurement Fraud and Corruption

Lithuania · Vilnius · See the Lithuania profile

Lithuania's STT, with the OECD and Government Transparency Institute (EU-funded), built a Hellinger Distance Random Forest on 11 merged datasets. Its top-risk quartile of contracts captured 60% of known criminal-offence cases, versus 25% at random.

STT's Machine-Learning Risk Model for Public-Procurement Fraud and Corruption

Details

Promoter
Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania (STT)
Period
2024–2025
Keywords
anti-corruption, public procurement, law-enforcement analytics

Description

The Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania (STT) worked with the OECD and the Government Transparency Institute, funded by the European Commission's Technical Support Instrument, to build a machine-learning risk-assessment tool for public procurement. The project integrated eleven administrative datasets — covering criminal and administrative offences, company registries, beneficial ownership, blacklisting and EU-funded project data — into a single analytical database, restructuring procurement records from tender-level to lot-level to capture bidding dynamics.
Because only a small share of contracts are linked to confirmed offences, the team used a Hellinger Distance Stratified Random Forest, a method designed for Positive-Unlabelled learning and severe class imbalance. Every prediction is paired with SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values in an interactive dashboard, so STT analysts can trace exactly which factors — bidding patterns, ownership concentration, network position — drove a given contract's risk score, rather than treating the model as a black box.
In back-testing, focusing investigative attention on the top 25% of contracts by predicted risk captured roughly 60% of contracts linked to proven or suspected criminal offences (versus the 25% expected under random selection), and the top 10% captured about five times more known cases than chance. The OECD's published case study is explicit that this is a proof-of-concept, not an operational system: it recommends an initial phase of annual updates backed by a stable data pipeline before wider deployment, and stresses that the tool is meant to guide investigator judgement, not replace it.

Read the full analysis: https://antifraud-knowledge-centre.ec.europa.eu/library-good-practices-and-case-studies/good-practices/special-investigation-service-stt_en

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful