The Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania (STT) worked with the OECD and the Government Transparency Institute, funded by the European Commission's Technical Support Instrument, to build a machine-learning risk-assessment tool for public procurement. The project integrated eleven administrative datasets — covering criminal and administrative offences, company registries, beneficial ownership, blacklisting and EU-funded project data — into a single analytical database, restructuring procurement records from tender-level to lot-level to capture bidding dynamics.
Because only a small share of contracts are linked to confirmed offences, the team used a Hellinger Distance Stratified Random Forest, a method designed for Positive-Unlabelled learning and severe class imbalance. Every prediction is paired with SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values in an interactive dashboard, so STT analysts can trace exactly which factors — bidding patterns, ownership concentration, network position — drove a given contract's risk score, rather than treating the model as a black box.
In back-testing, focusing investigative attention on the top 25% of contracts by predicted risk captured roughly 60% of contracts linked to proven or suspected criminal offences (versus the 25% expected under random selection), and the top 10% captured about five times more known cases than chance. The OECD's published case study is explicit that this is a proof-of-concept, not an operational system: it recommends an initial phase of annual updates backed by a stable data pipeline before wider deployment, and stresses that the tool is meant to guide investigator judgement, not replace it.
Read the full analysis: https://antifraud-knowledge-centre.ec.europa.eu/library-good-practices-and-case-studies/good-practices/special-investigation-service-stt_en
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.