evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Surtrac — Pittsburgh's AI-Adaptive Traffic Signals Cut Travel Time 26% and Wait Times 41%

United States of America · Pittsburgh · See the United States of America profile · See the Pittsburgh profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 25% 73/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Pittsburgh's Surtrac AI traffic-signal system, built with Carnegie Mellon University, cut travel time 26%, wait times 41% and emissions 21% in its original East Liberty pilot. The city has since secured $20M+ to scale it from 50 to about 200 intersections citywide.

-26%
Average travel time change (2012 pilot)
-41%
Intersection wait time change (2012 pilot)
-31%
Number of stops change (2012 pilot)
-21%
Vehicle emissions change (2012 pilot)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
City of Pittsburgh Department of Mobility and Infrastructure / Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute (Rapid Flow Technologies)
Period
2012-2026
Keywords
traffic management, adaptive control, machine learning, urban mobility

Context

In 2012 the City of Pittsburgh, working with Carnegie Mellon University's Robotics Institute, installed Surtrac, an AI-based adaptive traffic-signal system, at nine intersections in the East Liberty neighbourhood, replacing fixed-timing signal plans.

Objectives

Let each intersection build its own short-term signal plan from local sensor data in real time, then share plans with neighbouring intersections so clusters of vehicles move through corridors with fewer stops.

Activities

Carnegie Mellon spun out Rapid Flow Technologies to commercialise and maintain Surtrac; Pittsburgh scaled the system from 9 to roughly 50 signalised intersections by 2016, and the city has since committed over $20 million with state and federal partners to expand to around 200 intersections citywide.

Results

The independent CMU evaluation of the original East Liberty pilot measured a 26% reduction in average travel time, a 41% cut in intersection wait times, a 31% drop in the number of stops, and a 21% reduction in vehicle emissions versus the previous fixed-time signals.

Conclusions

The quantified results are specific to the original 9-intersection pilot; later expansion phases have not published an equivalent independent before/after evaluation, though city officials and vendor materials still cite the pilot figures when describing today's programme.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M) — $20M+ committed by the city plus state/federal partners to expand from ~50 to ~200 signalised intersections citywide; the original 9-intersection pilot cost is not separately disclosed.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Pilot deployed 2012; scaled to ~50 intersections by 2016; further expansion to ~200 intersections was underway as of the latest reporting.
Staffing & skills
CMU Robotics Institute researchers, Rapid Flow Technologies (spin-out vendor), City of Pittsburgh Dept. of Mobility and Infrastructure staff

Conditions for success

  • Local sensor data at each intersection to build real-time signal plans
  • A university research partnership to develop and validate the adaptive algorithm
  • Dedicated capital funding to expand beyond the original pilot corridor
  • A commercial vendor (Rapid Flow Technologies) to maintain the system at scale

Where it fits

Governance type
municipal
Scale
citywide arterial network

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful