evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

The Drive Project — A Whole-System, Perpetrator-Focused Response to High-Harm Domestic Abuse in England and Wales

United Kingdom · Chelmsford · See the United Kingdom profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 18% 89/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A case-managed intervention for high-harm, serial domestic-abuse perpetrators combining behaviour-change work, disruption and victim support. A Bristol University evaluation found physical abuse fell 82% and police-recorded reoffending fell ~30%, versus usual care.

-82%
Reduction in physical abuse
-88%
Reduction in sexual abuse
-75%
Reduction in harassment and stalking
-73%
Reduction in jealous and controlling behaviour
82% % of cases
Victims with reduced risk reported by IDVAs
-30%
Reduction in police-recorded reoffending (6 months post- vs pre-intervention)
The Drive Project — A Whole-System, Perpetrator-Focused Response to High-Harm Domestic Abuse in England and Wales

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Respect, SafeLives and Social Finance (the Drive Partnership); independently evaluated by the University of Bristol
Period
2016–2019 pilot (Essex, South Wales, West Sussex); national roll-out since 2019
Keywords
domestic abuse, criminal justice, victim safety, multi-agency case management

Context

The Drive Project is a case-managed intervention targeting high-risk, high-harm and serial perpetrators of domestic abuse identified through Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conferences (MARACs). Launched in 2016 by the Drive Partnership (Respect, SafeLives and Social Finance), it combines one-to-one behaviour-change work with 'disruption' of the perpetrator using existing housing, immigration, licensing and criminal-justice levers, alongside independent support for victims.

Objectives

Rather than relying on a single group programme, Drive aims to reduce abusive behaviour and reoffending among the highest-harm perpetrators through coordinated, multi-agency case management.

Activities

Drive was piloted for three years (2016–2019) in Essex, South Wales and West Sussex, then expanded to further areas including Cardiff, Croydon, Birmingham, and Sandwell and Worcestershire, and now underpins England and Wales' wider domestic-abuse perpetrator strategy.

Results

A University of Bristol evaluation covering 2,627 perpetrators, using a quasi-experimental design with individually randomised elements, found self-reported physical abuse fell 82%, sexual abuse 88%, harassment and stalking 75%, and jealous and controlling behaviour 73% among Drive service users. Police-recorded domestic-abuse offending fell around 30% in the six months after the intervention, with effects for repeat and serial perpetrators still significant a year later.

Conclusions

No published cost-effectiveness or cost-per-perpetrator analysis was found for Drive, so unlike its behavioural and reoffending outcomes, its economic efficiency is not yet independently evidenced.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
case managers coordinating one-to-one perpetrator work, independent domestic violence advocates (IDVAs) supporting victims, multi-agency partners (housing, immigration, licensing, criminal justice) supplying 'disruption' levers

Conditions for success

  • referral via Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conferences (MARACs) to target the highest-harm/serial perpetrators
  • coordinated use of existing housing/immigration/licensing/criminal-justice levers to disrupt behaviour
  • a parallel, independent support track for victims, separate from the perpetrator intervention

Common failure modes

  • no published cost-effectiveness or cost-per-perpetrator analysis exists, so economic efficiency is unproven

Where it fits

Governance type
multi-agency partnership (charities + social investor + statutory agencies)
Scale
piloted in 3 areas, expanded to at least 5 more, feeding a national strategy
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful