A case-managed intervention for high-harm, serial domestic-abuse perpetrators combining behaviour-change work, disruption and victim support. A Bristol University evaluation found physical abuse fell 82% and police-recorded reoffending fell ~30%, versus usual care.
-82%
Reduction in physical abuse
-88%
Reduction in sexual abuse
-75%
Reduction in harassment and stalking
-73%
Reduction in jealous and controlling behaviour
82% % of cases
Victims with reduced risk reported by IDVAs
-30%
Reduction in police-recorded reoffending (6 months post- vs pre-intervention)
Details
Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Respect, SafeLives and Social Finance (the Drive Partnership); independently evaluated by the University of Bristol
Period
2016–2019 pilot (Essex, South Wales, West Sussex); national roll-out since 2019
Keywords
domestic abuse, criminal justice, victim safety, multi-agency case management
Context
The Drive Project is a case-managed intervention targeting high-risk, high-harm and serial perpetrators of domestic abuse identified through Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conferences (MARACs). Launched in 2016 by the Drive Partnership (Respect, SafeLives and Social Finance), it combines one-to-one behaviour-change work with 'disruption' of the perpetrator using existing housing, immigration, licensing and criminal-justice levers, alongside independent support for victims.
Objectives
Rather than relying on a single group programme, Drive aims to reduce abusive behaviour and reoffending among the highest-harm perpetrators through coordinated, multi-agency case management.
Activities
Drive was piloted for three years (2016–2019) in Essex, South Wales and West Sussex, then expanded to further areas including Cardiff, Croydon, Birmingham, and Sandwell and Worcestershire, and now underpins England and Wales' wider domestic-abuse perpetrator strategy.
Results
A University of Bristol evaluation covering 2,627 perpetrators, using a quasi-experimental design with individually randomised elements, found self-reported physical abuse fell 82%, sexual abuse 88%, harassment and stalking 75%, and jealous and controlling behaviour 73% among Drive service users. Police-recorded domestic-abuse offending fell around 30% in the six months after the intervention, with effects for repeat and serial perpetrators still significant a year later.
Conclusions
No published cost-effectiveness or cost-per-perpetrator analysis was found for Drive, so unlike its behavioural and reoffending outcomes, its economic efficiency is not yet independently evidenced.
Intensive one-to-one case management for high-harm domestic abuse perpetrators in England and Wales. An independent University of Bristol RCT (2016–2019, …
A court-mandated two-year men's programme paired with parallel support services for women and children, delivered by Scottish local-authority criminal justice …