evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Udbetaling Danmark's 60-Model Fraud System — Denmark's AI Welfare State Faces an Ombudsman Inquiry

Denmark · Hillerød · See the Denmark profile

Top 75% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Denmark's Udbetaling Danmark runs over 60 algorithmic models to flag suspected benefits fraud. Amnesty's 2024 'Coded Injustice' report found several disproportionately target disabled, low-income, migrant and refugee claimants, prompting a Parliamentary Ombudsman inquiry.

Udbetaling Danmark's 60-Model Fraud System — Denmark's AI Welfare State Faces an Ombudsman Inquiry

Details

Promoter
Udbetaling Danmark (ATP) / NNIT
Period
2012–2025
Keywords
social welfare, fraud detection, algorithmic risk scoring

Description

Udbetaling Danmark (UDK), the agency that has centralised most Danish welfare payments since 2012 in partnership with pension fund ATP, uses more than 60 algorithmic and machine-learning models — built by IT contractor NNIT — to flag applicants and claimants for suspected benefits fraud investigations.
Amnesty International's November 2024 report 'Coded Injustice' obtained partial documentation on only 4 of the 60 models, but found that named models such as 'Really Single' (which flags 'atypical' cohabitation or living patterns) and 'Model Abroad' (which flags 'medium to high' ties to non-EEA countries) systematically increase scrutiny of people with disabilities, low-income individuals, migrants and refugees, and people in non-traditional households.
Amnesty argues the fraud-control system likely falls under the EU AI Act's 'social scoring' prohibition, which took effect on 1 August 2024. The Danish Parliament debated the findings in spring 2024, but the governing coalition declined to suspend the models, promising only 'ongoing internal monitoring'; the Parliamentary Ombudsman opened a formal inquiry in June 2024 into flagship models including the 'Gladsaxe Model'.
The case shows that even one of the world's most digitised welfare states can run a large, decade-old portfolio of opaque automated risk-scoring models — with only partial external visibility — for years before an independent body formally examines it.

Read the full analysis: https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366615893/Denmarks-AI-powered-welfare-system-fuels-mass-surveillance

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful