evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

WIPO's Global Brand Database AI Image Search — Deep-Learning Trademark Search Across 45 Offices

Switzerland · Geneva · See the Switzerland profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 15% 80/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

WIPO's free Global Brand Database uses deep neural networks to match trademark images by concept — apple, eagle, star — rather than keywords, pooling close to 38 million marks from 45 offices' national collections since its April 2019 launch.

45
Participating trademark offices (2019)
~38,000,000
Registered marks covered at launch (2019)
2019
Launch year
WIPO's Global Brand Database AI Image Search — Deep-Learning Trademark Search Across 45 Offices

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Period
2019-present
Keywords
intellectual property, trademark search, government digitalisation, AI-assisted search

Context

Launched in April 2019 and integrated into WIPO's Global Brand Database, this free tool uses deep machine learning, trained on figurative-element classification data from the Madrid System and major trademark offices, to recognise visual concepts within a trademark image — an apple, an eagle, a crown, a star — rather than relying on keyword tags.

Results

The tool covers the national trademark collections of 45 participating offices, representing close to 38 million registered marks at launch, including offices that had never used a figurative-element classification system before. WIPO states the tool 'delivers results in a second' and produces 'labor-cost savings for trademark examiners, attorneys and paralegals', but this is WIPO's own characterisation, repeated by independent IP trade press, rather than a quantified or externally audited evaluation.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
WIPO Global Brand Database technical team (Madrid System)

Conditions for success

  • participation and data-sharing from national/regional trademark offices
  • figurative-element classification training data from the Madrid System

Common failure modes

  • no independently audited accuracy or time-saved evaluation has been published

Commonly funded by

Own resources / municipal budget

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful