evidoria

Browse practices

Catalogue: AI in Education clear

This selection at a glance

8
matching practices
33%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Evidence mix

Quasi-experimental 2
Observational / pre–post 1
Descriptive / self-reported 3

2 practices not yet assessed for evidence strength.

Most practices in: Netherlands (8)

Results

8 result(s) Download CSV Get alerts for this search Cards List
SelectTitleEvidenceStandingTypeLocationScale
DART — Radboud University's Speech-Recognition Reading Tutor Boosts First-Graders' Decoding Skills in the Netherlands Not assessed Top 14% 67/100 Good practice Nijmegen, Netherlands —
Snappet — AI-adaptive primary school practice in the Netherlands Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 14% 67/100 Good practice Utrecht, Netherlands —
FeedbackFruits — AI-augmented peer-assessment platform for higher education Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 24% 60/100 Good practice Amsterdam, Netherlands —
AI Toetsingskader — SIVON and Kennisnet's EU AI Act Compliance Framework for Dutch Schools Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 40% 53/100 Good practice Zoetermeer, Netherlands —
EduGenAI — SURF and Npuls' Privacy-by-Design Generative-AI Platform for Dutch Education, DPIA-Cleared Before National Rollout Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 70% 40/100 Good practice Utrecht, Netherlands —
DRIVE — TU Eindhoven's Framework for Assessing Learning Through Students' Interactions with Generative AI Not assessed Top 81% 33/100 Good practice Eindhoven, Netherlands —
Proctorio at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam — A Cautionary Case in AI Exam-Proctoring Bias Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 98% 13/100 Good practice Amsterdam, Netherlands —
DUO's Discriminatory Fraud-Detection Algorithm — A National Cautionary Case in Automated Student-Grant Checks Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 100% 7/100 Good practice Groningen, Netherlands —