evidoria

What works in Bern

All catalogues · Switzerland profile

8
evaluated practices
74/100
average quality score
25%
strong evidence, of 8 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Transparency, ethics & data protection +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +47 pts 100 here · 53 average

Governance, certification & transferability +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Transferability / replicability +24 pts 83 here · 59 average

Efficiency +23 pts 75 here · 52 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Evaluation evidence +14 pts 50 here · 36 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Evaluated outcomes -9 pts 75 here · 84 average

Innovation level -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of learning impact -30 pts 0 here · 30 average

Curator validation -50 pts 25 here · 75 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Transparency, ethics & data protection
100 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 53
Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 66
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Transferability / replicability
83 · 59
Efficiency
75 · 52
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 80
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Evaluation evidence
50 · 36
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Scalability & sustainability
67 · 66
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 35
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 39
Effectiveness
75 · 81
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Evaluated outcomes
75 · 84
Innovation level
50 · 64
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 30
Curator validation
25 · 75

Coloured bar: Bern. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Switzerland Mandatory Equal Pay Analysis — Revised Gender Equality Act 2020 (Art. 13 GEA) · 89

Pro Senectute Digital Seniors – National Digital Skills Programme for Older Adults (Switzerland) · 88

Switzerland Federal Childcare Grant Programme — Financial Aid for Family-External Childcare (2003–2026) · 85

AHV/AVS Income Splitting & Child-Rearing Credits — Switzerland's Statutory Pension Gender-Gap Mechanism · 78

Switzerland Statutory Paternity Leave — Two-Week EOG Entitlement after September 2020 Referendum · 74

Powercoders Italy · 72

Switzerland Federal Biodiversity Contributions (Agri-Environment PES) · 60

Switzerland's educa.ch — a Federal-Cantonal Legal Framework for AI in Schools · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Empowering Global Leadership: The Role of International Women's Forum Finland in Advancing Women's Leadership and Gender Equality · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more