What works in Bogota
All catalogues · Colombia profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Bogota
Bogota's oversight office deployed VigIA, a machine-learning early-warning system that achieved 87.47% accuracy and an AUC of 0.943 in predicting cost overruns across 87,387 public contracts from 2018–2020, and 0.936 AUC for predicting delivery delays. The tool combines logistic regression and random-forest classifiers with purpose-built risk indices to flag procurement contracts at risk of irregularities, using SECOP II procurement records and sanction data, and is now available as a public-facing dashboard within Veeduria Distrital. However, the evidence documents only the validated model's performance on historical test data; no independent source yet confirms rollout to other Colombian cities or the number of investigations or sanctions it has directly triggered.
Drawn from: Equipares — Colombia's Gender-Equality Management Seal for Employers · VigIA — Bogota's Machine-Learning Early-Warning System for Public Procurement Irregularities · Opportunities Without Borders - Pro Mujer's Economic Inclusion Programme for Venezuelan Migrant Women in Colombia · ICFES Cuts National Exam Grading Time 91.6% with AWS/Blend AI-Assisted Coding of Open Responses
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Transparency, fairness & accountability +46 pts 100 here · 54 average
Effectiveness +32 pts 100 here · 68 average
Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average
Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average
Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value +9 pts 67 here · 57 average
Weaknesses
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average
Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average
Sustainability -28 pts 50 here · 78 average
Evaluated outcomes -29 pts 50 here · 79 average
Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Bogota. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Equipares — Colombia's Gender-Equality Management Seal for Employers · 85
VigIA — Bogota's Machine-Learning Early-Warning System for Public Procurement Irregularities · 67
ICFES Cuts National Exam Grading Time 91.6% with AWS/Blend AI-Assisted Coding of Open Responses · 47
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more