What works in Coventry
All catalogues · United Kingdom profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Coventry
The High Value Manufacturing Catapult shows that Coventry has benefited from the Manufacturing Technology Centre (MTC), which is one of seven UK manufacturing R&D centres launched in 2011. MTC's presence in Coventry has drawn approximately £800m of clustered regional direct investment and is associated with around 2,750 jobs. The evidence does not quantify broader economic or social outcomes for Coventry beyond these direct investment and employment figures, nor does it address other sectors or policy areas in the city.
Drawn from: High Value Manufacturing Catapult — UK's Applied-Research Network Bridging University R&D to Manufacturers · Ofqual's 2020 A-Level Standardisation Algorithm — the Grading Model Withdrawn After 39% of Results Were Downgraded · Ofqual's 2020 Exam-Grading Algorithm — A National Cautionary Case in Automated Assessment
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Evidence of impact / measured results +26 pts 83 here · 57 average
Weaknesses
Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average
Sustainability / continuity -12 pts 67 here · 78 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average
Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average
Governance, capability & sustainability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average
Scalability & sustainability -40 pts 22 here · 62 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection -47 pts 0 here · 47 average
Equity & inclusion -50 pts 0 here · 50 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Coventry. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Ofqual's 2020 Exam-Grading Algorithm — A National Cautionary Case in Automated Assessment · 0
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more