evidoria

What works in Curitiba

All catalogues · Brazil profile

3
evaluated practices
36/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 3 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Curitiba

Curitiba's Solo Criado shows that the city has used transferable development rights since the 1990s to preserve forest and green space, formalised in Law 9,804/2000, which allows landowners to sell unused building rights to developers elsewhere rather than face construction bans. Green space per resident rose from under 1m² in 1970 to approximately 52m² today, with the city now designating 50 Conservation Units including 22 municipal parks and 16 protected woods. However, the evidence does not quantify ecosystem outcomes (carbon storage, water quality, species counts) specifically tied to the transferable-development-rights mechanism itself, as opposed to the city's broader parks programme.

Drawn from: Paraná ICMS Ecológico — Brazil's First Ecological Fiscal Transfer (1991) · Curitiba's Solo Criado — Transferable Development Rights for Forest & Green-Space Preservation · LRCO Paraná — A Cautionary Case of Facial-Recognition School Attendance Facing an LGPD Lawsuit

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Governance, certification & transferability +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 67 here · 53 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -18 pts 17 here · 35 average

Evidence of learning impact -30 pts 0 here · 30 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -39 pts 0 here · 39 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Equity & inclusion -54 pts 0 here · 54 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 66
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 53
Scalability & sustainability
67 · 66
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 51
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 35
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 30
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 39
Transparency, ethics & data protection
0 · 50
Equity & inclusion
0 · 54

Coloured bar: Curitiba. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Paraná ICMS Ecológico — Brazil's First Ecological Fiscal Transfer (1991) · 60

Curitiba's Solo Criado — Transferable Development Rights for Forest & Green-Space Preservation · 33

LRCO Paraná — A Cautionary Case of Facial-Recognition School Attendance Facing an LGPD Lawsuit · 13

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more