UK DfE policy on generative AI in education
United Kingdom
The UK government's June 2025 position on generative AI in schools and colleges: embrace the opportunity, but with human oversight, …
Brazil · Curitiba · See the Brazil profile · See the Curitiba profile
Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 100% 7/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Paraná's education department used facial recognition for attendance in over 2,000 public schools, covering about 1 million students. Brazil's ANPD suspended the practice in August 2026, citing high-risk biometric processing of children without adequate legal basis.
Since 2023, Paraná state's education department (SEED-PR) used a facial-recognition system built with state IT company Celepar and vendor Valid Soluções to record classroom attendance via the Escola Paraná app, matching photographed classes to registered student photos; at peak the tool was used in more than 1,600 (later reports ~2,100) of the state network's schools, covering approximately one million students.
Automate classroom attendance-taking across the Paraná state school network using facial recognition.
In April 2025, a Ministério Público do Paraná (MPPR) prosecutor filed a civil action against the state government, Celepar and Valid Soluções seeking suspension and collective moral damages; independent testing by São Paulo State University (Unesp) researchers found the system's accuracy at 91.1%, below the 95% threshold specified in the state's own procurement contract.
On 4 August 2026, Brazil's national data protection authority (ANPD) ordered the immediate suspension of the system, classifying biometric processing of children's data as high-risk and citing five groups of irregularities, including absence of an adequate legal basis under Brazil's LGPD (Articles 11, 14 and 46-47), insufficient security measures, and failure to prioritise the best interests of the children whose data was processed.
The case is recorded as a large-scale, well-documented cautionary example - evidence of harm and regulatory failure at national-programme scale, not of a positive learning or governance practice.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United Kingdom
The UK government's June 2025 position on generative AI in schools and colleges: embrace the opportunity, but with human oversight, …
Finland
Finland's education ministry and Opetushallitus published national AI recommendations (31 March 2025) after consulting 172 organisations and youth 'Digiraati' councils, …
Japan
Japan's education ministry issued provisional national guidelines in July 2023 on generative AI in schools, paired with 52 designated pilot …
Portugal
Portugal's National Education Council published Recommendation 4/2026 in May 2026, mandating AI literacy from primary school, an independent education AI …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.