evidoria

What works in Riga

All catalogues · Latvia profile

28
evaluated practices
62/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 27 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Riga

Riga hosts initiatives focused on women's economic empowerment and leadership development. Women4Cyber Latvia, backed by the European Cyber Security Organisation, operates a national office in Riga to increase female participation in cybersecurity, where women comprise only about 25% of the workforce. TechHub Riga engages with networking challenges facing women in tech through initiatives like Riga TechGirls. Additionally, SheXO Club in Latvia has recruited over 40 women leaders and held 15+ quarterly events on executive development topics, though no independent evaluation of career outcomes has been published.

Drawn from: Novatore's Vision: Championing Women's Leadership and Economic Growth in the Baltics · Women’s Non-Governmental Organizations Cooperation Network of Latvia · Empowering Women in Cybersecurity: Women4Cyber Latvia · SheXO Club The Power Of Women In Business: Development, Leadership, Networking · Breaking Barriers: Empowering Women in Tech through Effective Networking Strategies · ESCORT — Latvia's State Revenue Service ML risk-scoring system for tax compliance · Work in Riga — Latvia's first integrated digital platform for international talent attraction · Hugo.lv — Latvia's National Network of AI Virtual Assistants for Public Services

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +58 pts 67 here · 9 average

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +33 pts 83 here · 50 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +32 pts 67 here · 35 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 67 here · 53 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +12 pts 78 here · 66 average

Transferability / replicability +11 pts 70 here · 59 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +11 pts 50 here · 39 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -8 pts 70 here · 78 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -9 pts 52 here · 60 average

Curator validation -9 pts 66 here · 75 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of learning impact -30 pts 0 here · 30 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Score profile vs peers

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
67 · 9
Efficiency
100 · 52
Transparency, ethics & data protection
83 · 50
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 35
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 53
Governance, capability & sustainability
78 · 66
Transferability / replicability
70 · 59
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 39
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Inclusiveness / equity
48 · 41
Documented learning
80 · 73
Scalability
72 · 66
Demonstrated reach
80 · 75
Sustainability
79 · 80
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Evaluated outcomes
80 · 84
Innovation level
60 · 64
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
70 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured results
52 · 60
Curator validation
66 · 75
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 30
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36

Coloured bar: Riga. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Novatore's Vision: Championing Women's Leadership and Economic Growth in the Baltics · 100

Women’s Non-Governmental Organizations Cooperation Network of Latvia · 96

Empowering Women in Cybersecurity: Women4Cyber Latvia · 93

SheXO Club The Power Of Women In Business: Development, Leadership, Networking · 85

Breaking Barriers: Empowering Women in Tech through Effective Networking Strategies · 84

ESCORT — Latvia's State Revenue Service ML risk-scoring system for tax compliance · 80

Work in Riga — Latvia's first integrated digital platform for international talent attraction · 76

Hugo.lv — Latvia's National Network of AI Virtual Assistants for Public Services · 73

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more