evidoria

What works in São Tomé

All catalogues · Sao Tome and Principe profile

6
evaluated practices
57/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for São Tomé

HRSI Poverty Maps — Satellite-and-Machine-Learning Targeting for São Tomé and Príncipe's Safety Net shows São Tomé and Príncipe faces constraints in poverty data collection that prompted the World Bank to build satellite-based targeting tools. Digital São Tomé and Príncipe Project reveals a US$23.9M World Bank programme underway (36% disbursed by September 2025) to expand submarine fibre, school connectivity, digital ID and cyber capacity across the islands. CECAB — São Tomé's Farmer-Owned Organic Cocoa Cooperative demonstrates the country's cocoa sector, where roughly 3,000 farmers in the CECAB cooperative produced 1,650 tonnes in 2021 (a 40% increase on 2020) and opened a €450,000 chocolate factory in 2022 to move into value-added manufacturing. São Tomé and Príncipe's Political Parity Law shows that on 28 July 2022 the National Assembly unanimously passed legislation reserving 40% of parliamentary, cabinet and public-administration posts for women, though real implementation remains to be tested in the September 2026 election.

Drawn from: HRSI Poverty Maps — Satellite-and-Machine-Learning Targeting for São Tomé and Príncipe's Safety Net · Digital São Tomé and Príncipe Project (STP Digital) · CECAB — São Tomé's Farmer-Owned Organic Cocoa Cooperative Moves from Raw Beans to Chocolate · São Tomé and Príncipe's Political Parity Law: A 40% Quota Awaiting Its First Electoral Test · Giga's AI Satellite Mapping Reaches Every School in São Tomé and Príncipe · TRI–CECAB Agroforestry Carbon Programme — São Tomé's First Payment for Ecosystem Services Scheme

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +46 pts 100 here · 54 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +39 pts 67 here · 28 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +26 pts 83 here · 57 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Transferability / replicability +18 pts 78 here · 60 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Sustainability +11 pts 89 here · 78 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Governance, certification & transferability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average

Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average

Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes -79 pts 0 here · 79 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Transparency, fairness & accountability
100 · 54
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 28
Curator validation
100 · 73
Evidence of impact / measured public value
83 · 57
Documented learning
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Transferability / replicability
78 · 60
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Sustainability
89 · 78
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Scalability beyond pilot
67 · 62
Innovation level
63 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Governance, certification & transferability
50 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Efficiency
0 · 33
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 37
Effectiveness
0 · 68
Impact on gender equality
0 · 71
Demonstrated reach
0 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 79

Coloured bar: São Tomé. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

HRSI Poverty Maps — Satellite-and-Machine-Learning Targeting for São Tomé and Príncipe's Safety Net · 73

Digital São Tomé and Príncipe Project (STP Digital) · 72

CECAB — São Tomé's Farmer-Owned Organic Cocoa Cooperative Moves from Raw Beans to Chocolate · 67

São Tomé and Príncipe's Political Parity Law: A 40% Quota Awaiting Its First Electoral Test · 52

Giga's AI Satellite Mapping Reaches Every School in São Tomé and Príncipe · 40

TRI–CECAB Agroforestry Carbon Programme — São Tomé's First Payment for Ecosystem Services Scheme · 40

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more