evidoria

What works in Sao Tome and Principe

All catalogues

6
evaluated practices
57/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Sao Tome and Principe

São Tomé and Príncipe is implementing technology and governance reforms to strengthen development capacity. A World Bank poverty-mapping programme is applying satellite imagery and machine learning at 110m resolution to target social safety nets, while a US$23.9M digital infrastructure project approved in 2022 is building submarine fibre, school connectivity, a data platform and digital ID, with 36% of IDA funding disbursed by September 2025. The country's cocoa sector is diversifying: CECAB, a 3,000-farmer organic cooperative, achieved 40% cocoa output growth in 2021 and opened a €450,000 chocolate factory in 2022, though production faces theft losses of up to 40% in some periods and EU certification rule changes now requiring restructuring. In July 2022 the National Assembly unanimously passed a 40% gender quota law for parliament, cabinet and public administration, though the evidence does not yet document its electoral impact or implementation results.

Drawn from: HRSI Poverty Maps — Satellite-and-Machine-Learning Targeting for São Tomé and Príncipe's Safety Net · Digital São Tomé and Príncipe Project (STP Digital) · CECAB — São Tomé's Farmer-Owned Organic Cocoa Cooperative Moves from Raw Beans to Chocolate · São Tomé and Príncipe's Political Parity Law: A 40% Quota Awaiting Its First Electoral Test · Giga's AI Satellite Mapping Reaches Every School in São Tomé and Príncipe · TRI–CECAB Agroforestry Carbon Programme — São Tomé's First Payment for Ecosystem Services Scheme

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +46 pts 100 here · 54 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +40 pts 67 here · 27 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +26 pts 83 here · 57 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Transferability / replicability +18 pts 78 here · 60 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Sustainability +11 pts 89 here · 78 average

Weaknesses

Governance, certification & transferability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -38 pts 0 here · 38 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average

Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Transparency, fairness & accountability
100 · 54
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 27
Curator validation
100 · 73
Evidence of impact / measured public value
83 · 57
Documented learning
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Transferability / replicability
78 · 60
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Sustainability
89 · 78
Scalability beyond pilot
67 · 62
Innovation level
63 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Governance, certification & transferability
50 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Efficiency
0 · 32
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 38
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Impact on gender equality
0 · 70
Demonstrated reach
0 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 78

Coloured bar: Sao Tome and Principe. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

HRSI Poverty Maps — Satellite-and-Machine-Learning Targeting for São Tomé and Príncipe's Safety Net · 73

Digital São Tomé and Príncipe Project (STP Digital) · 72

CECAB — São Tomé's Farmer-Owned Organic Cocoa Cooperative Moves from Raw Beans to Chocolate · 67

São Tomé and Príncipe's Political Parity Law: A 40% Quota Awaiting Its First Electoral Test · 52

Giga's AI Satellite Mapping Reaches Every School in São Tomé and Príncipe · 40

TRI–CECAB Agroforestry Carbon Programme — São Tomé's First Payment for Ecosystem Services Scheme · 40

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Sao Tome and Principe concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more