What works in Stanford
All catalogues · United States of America profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Stanford
Stanford's Office of Technology Licensing has generated $88m+ in annual licensing revenue and launched 28 new startups in FY2025, though only an estimated 20–25% of the 541 invention disclosures received are ever licensed, indicating highly concentrated returns from a small number of blockbuster patents. In educational technology, a randomised trial of GPT-4 in Stanford's Code in Place course with 5,831 learners found that offering the tool reduced average exam participation and attendance, though students who actually adopted it scored better on exams, with benefits concentrated among learners from low-HDI countries. In response to concerns about generative-AI-enabled cheating, Stanford voted in May 2026 to end 105 years of unproctored exams, expanding a pilot of equitable proctoring practices—though the evidence linking the policy shift directly to an AI-driven cheating surge rests on faculty testimony rather than published, AI-specific violation counts.
Drawn from: Stanford OTL — From Cohen-Boyer to Google, a Self-Funding University Tech-Transfer Engine · The GPT Surprise — Stanford's Code in Place Randomised Trial of GPT-4 Chat for 5,831 Learners in 146 Countries · Stanford Ends 105 Years of Unproctored Exams — A Governance Response to Generative-AI Cheating
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evidence of impact / measured results +43 pts 100 here · 57 average
Transferability / demonstrated replication +40 pts 100 here · 60 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Sustainability / continuity +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average
Scalability +16 pts 78 here · 62 average
Weaknesses
Teacher capability & pedagogy -21 pts 17 here · 37 average
Inclusiveness / equity -43 pts 0 here · 43 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Stanford. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Stanford OTL — From Cohen-Boyer to Google, a Self-Funding University Tech-Transfer Engine · 81
Stanford Ends 105 Years of Unproctored Exams — A Governance Response to Generative-AI Cheating · 33
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Ushahidi — Kenya's Crowdsourced Crisis-Mapping Platform · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more