What works in Tampere
All catalogues · Finland profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Tampere
Tampere is testing circular economy and smart-city innovations in Hiedanranta, a 100-hectare former industrial district planned for 25,000 residents, though no quantified outcome metrics for these experiments are reported. The city also ran resident co-development programmes in two suburbs (Peltolammi–Multisilta) from 2020–2022, involving 27 residents on a panel and roughly 1,200 survey responses, which produced self-reported improvements in environmental quality and residents' influence, though these lack independent verification. Additionally, Tampere hosted educator workshops on AI and disinformation through the EU-funded TADAM project, where participants reported medium-large to large gains in perceived preparedness on four dimensions, but only self-rated preparedness was measured, not demonstrated teaching competence.
Drawn from: Hiedanranta — a smart, circular district as a testbed (Tampere) · Peltolammi–Multisilta Suburban Programme, Tampere — Resident Co-Development in Finland's National Suburb Programme 2020–2022 · TADAM — Educator Workshops on AI, Algorithms and Disinformation Across Romania, France and Finland (Pre-Post Quasi-Experimental Evaluation)
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 38 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average
Weaknesses
Equity & inclusion -16 pts 33 here · 50 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Tampere. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Hiedanranta — a smart, circular district as a testbed (Tampere) · 86
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more