evidoria

What works in Zagreb

All catalogues · Croatia profile

24
evaluated practices
57/100
average quality score
5%
strong evidence, of 21 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Zagreb

Croatia's First National Web Accessibility Audit — No Public Site Cleared 50% Full Compliance tested public-sector website accessibility across Croatian regions and found that the City of Zagreb lagged behind other regions, scoring 71–74% average compliance against the highest-performing regions (Adriatic and Northern Croatia at 81% and 80%). The audit tested 158 public-sector homepages, 18 sites in depth, and 8 mobile apps against 87–102 EN 301 549 accessibility requirements, though no monitored website in any region—including Zagreb—fully satisfied more than 50% of all tracked requirements.

Drawn from: e-Schools – Development of a System of Digitally Mature Schools in Croatia · Croatia's First National Web Accessibility Audit — No Public Site Cleared 50% Full Compliance · BrAIn — Croatia's National AI Curriculum Pilot for Vocational Schools · Croatia's ANON — AI-Assisted Anonymisation and Nationwide Publication of Court Decisions · AI/NLP-Automated Regulatory Mapping — Croatia's World Bank-Supported Business-Licensing Stocktake · ANON — Croatia's AI tool for automated pseudonymisation of judicial decisions · Hrvatska knjižnica za slijepe — Croatia's National Accessible-Format Library for Blind and Print-Disabled Readers · BrAIn — AI Curriculum in Croatian Vocational Education and Training

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +44 pts 50 here · 6 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 37 average

Evaluation evidence +26 pts 75 here · 49 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of impact / measured results -9 pts 48 here · 57 average

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -11 pts 17 here · 28 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Innovation level -18 pts 44 here · 62 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -21 pts 53 here · 74 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -32 pts 17 here · 48 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average

Evaluated outcomes -79 pts 0 here · 79 average

Score profile vs peers

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
50 · 6
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 37
Evaluation evidence
75 · 49
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Scalability
69 · 62
Transferability / replicability
62 · 60
Sustainability
79 · 78
Demonstrated reach
75 · 76
Governance, capability & sustainability
62 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured results
48 · 57
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 28
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Innovation level
44 · 62
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
53 · 74
Curator validation
50 · 73
Documented learning
50 · 74
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
17 · 48
Efficiency
0 · 33
Impact on gender equality
0 · 71
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 79

Coloured bar: Zagreb. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

e-Schools – Development of a System of Digitally Mature Schools in Croatia · 92

Croatia's First National Web Accessibility Audit — No Public Site Cleared 50% Full Compliance · 88

BrAIn — Croatia's National AI Curriculum Pilot for Vocational Schools · 80

Croatia's ANON — AI-Assisted Anonymisation and Nationwide Publication of Court Decisions · 73

AI/NLP-Automated Regulatory Mapping — Croatia's World Bank-Supported Business-Licensing Stocktake · 73

ANON — Croatia's AI tool for automated pseudonymisation of judicial decisions · 73

Hrvatska knjižnica za slijepe — Croatia's National Accessible-Format Library for Blind and Print-Disabled Readers · 68

BrAIn — AI Curriculum in Croatian Vocational Education and Training · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more