evidoria

What works in Zagreb

All catalogues · Croatia profile

14
evaluated practices
59/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 14 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +91 pts 100 here · 9 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +50 pts 89 here · 39 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +46 pts 100 here · 54 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +39 pts 89 here · 50 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Evaluation evidence +14 pts 50 here · 36 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +12 pts 78 here · 66 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Sustainability -9 pts 71 here · 80 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -18 pts 33 here · 51 average

Innovation level -19 pts 46 here · 64 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Documented learning -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -25 pts 53 here · 78 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
100 · 9
Teacher capability & pedagogy
89 · 39
Transparency, fairness & accountability
100 · 54
Transparency, ethics & data protection
89 · 50
Curator validation
100 · 75
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Evaluation evidence
50 · 36
Governance, capability & sustainability
78 · 66
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Transferability / replicability
58 · 59
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 35
Evidence of impact / measured results
57 · 60
Scalability
60 · 66
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 41
Sustainability
71 · 80
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 51
Innovation level
46 · 64
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Documented learning
50 · 73
Demonstrated reach
50 · 75
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
53 · 78

Coloured bar: Zagreb. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

e-Schools – Development of a System of Digitally Mature Schools in Croatia · 92

BrAIn — Croatia's National AI Curriculum Pilot for Vocational Schools · 80

AI/NLP-Automated Regulatory Mapping — Croatia's World Bank-Supported Business-Licensing Stocktake · 73

ANON — Croatia's AI tool for automated pseudonymisation of judicial decisions · 73

BrAIn — AI Curriculum in Croatian Vocational Education and Training · 67

Second National Action Plan for Women (2019-2023) – NAP II · 59

Croatia's National Ministry-Funded AI-Text and Plagiarism Detection Infrastructure for Public Universities · 53

Croatia's Forest Public Benefit Function Fee (Naknada za Općekorisne Funkcije Šuma) · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more