What works in Curaçao
All catalogues
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Curaçao
Curaçao has invested in marine conservation and coral restoration, with a 21.7 km marine park established in 1983 hosting 65+ coral and 350+ fish species, and over 15,000 threatened corals outplanted since 2015. The island is pursuing digital transformation through a major school digitalisation project covering over 25,000 users with over 80% of schools internet-connected, and an AI Readiness Assessment completed in 2024 showing only 5–7% national AI adoption across public and private sectors. The evidence documents initiatives in place—such as a pandemic-era remote-work visa launched in 2021—though independent economic impact data remains unavailable for some programmes.
Drawn from: Curacao Marine Park & Reef Renewal: Four Decades of Protection Plus Coral Restoration · @HOME in Curaçao — A Pandemic-Era Multi-Ministry Remote-Work and Investor Visa · Curaçao's UNESCO AI Readiness Assessment — Mapping AI Governance and Classroom Adoption on a Small Island
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +52 pts 100 here · 48 average
Governance, certification & transferability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average
Weaknesses
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average
Equity & inclusion -16 pts 33 here · 50 average
Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average
Transferability / demonstrated replication -27 pts 33 here · 60 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average
Innovation -28 pts 33 here · 62 average
Scalability & sustainability -29 pts 33 here · 62 average
Inclusiveness / equity -43 pts 0 here · 43 average
Sustainability / continuity -45 pts 33 here · 78 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -48 pts 0 here · 48 average
Evidence of impact / measured results -57 pts 0 here · 57 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Curaçao. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Curacao Marine Park & Reef Renewal: Four Decades of Protection Plus Coral Restoration · 40
@HOME in Curaçao — A Pandemic-Era Multi-Ministry Remote-Work and Investor Visa · 29
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more