evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

@HOME in Curaçao — A Pandemic-Era Multi-Ministry Remote-Work and Investor Visa

Curaçao · Willemstad · See the Curaçao profile

Top 99% 29/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Curaçao's government launched the multi-ministry "@HOME in Curaçao" remote-work, investor and long-stay visa in February 2021, targeting c.625 applicants - but no public data on actual uptake or economic impact has since been published.

@HOME in Curaçao — A Pandemic-Era Multi-Ministry Remote-Work and Investor Visa

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Economic Development (MEO), Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Social Development, Labour and Welfare (SOAW), and Curaçao Tourist Board (CTB)
Period
2021–present
Keywords
remote work, tourism, migration policy, investment promotion

Description

Facing a pandemic-driven collapse in tourism, Curaçao's government launched "@HOME in Curaçao" on 11 February 2021, a joint initiative of the Ministry of Economic Development (MEO), the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Social Development, Labour and Welfare (SOAW) and the Curaçao Tourist Board (CTB), designed to attract longer-staying visitors as a substitute for short-stay tourism.
The programme created a formal temporary-stay permit covering three applicant categories - remote workers/digital nomads, "hibernators" (long-stay snowbirds) and investors - each eligible for an initial six-month stay with the option to renew for a further six months. The visa fee for remote workers/digital nomads is ANG 535 (about US$294), and the government set an initial interest target of roughly 625 applicants.
The programme's own site and independent travel-industry coverage confirm the scheme's design, launch date and interagency structure, but neither publishes verified application, approval or spending figures, and no independent economic evaluation of the programme's effect on the local economy has been identified.
Included as a small-island case of a fast, pandemic-era multi-ministry remote-work visa launched without a public monitoring or evaluation framework - a reminder that programme design and interagency coordination are not, on their own, evidence of impact.

Read the full analysis: https://athomeincuracao.com/faq/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful